Monthly Archives: November 2014

Buying Real Estate as an Immigrant to the U.S. | Bedford Hills Real Estate

The housing crisis may have tempered some enthusiasm for homeownership, but many people still consider putting down roots and buying a home to be part of the American dream. This is especially true for immigrants to the U.S. In fact, they accounted for nearly 40 percent of the net growth in homeowners between 2000 and 2010, according to a report by the Research Institute for Housing America (compare this with the 1970s when they represented just over 5 percent of the growth).

But the path to homeownership isn’t always easy for newcomers. Here a look at the challenges permanent or nonpermanent resident aliens with work visas or green cards sometimes face.

Language barriers. Many immigrants are fluent in English, but for those who aren’t, discussing complex mortgage or real estate terms can be a lot more complicated than exchanging pleasantries at the grocery store or completing a transaction at the post office. For instance, Jeff Riber, a broker and owner of ERA Heavener Realty in Jacksonville, Florida, worked with two couples who immigrated from Bosnia: a daughter who was fluent in English and her parents. “She was having to run point on the entire process for her parents,” he says. “If you don’t understand the terminology, it’s unnerving.” That’s where having a trusted friend or family member to translate can help, especially if the person has been through the homebuying process.

Qualifying for a mortgage. Noncitizens working in the U.S. can qualify for traditional mortgage financing, but because lenders look at U.S. credit histories, those new to the country may not have enough time to build a credit history. With government-backed loans requiring full documentation, lenders generally want to see at least two years of U.S. tax returns from borrowers, including nonpermanent residents (those who have a valid work visa but not a green card yet), according to Rob Spinosa, a Mill Valley, California-based mortgage loan originator with RPM Mortgage. If, for instance, you have been working in the country long enough to file 2012 and 2013 tax returns, you might qualify for a mortgage backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Having a relationship with an international institution that offers U.S. mortgages could also help secure a mortgage from that lender.

If not, you might still qualify for a loan from a portfolio lender — a company that originates mortgages and holds a portfolio of loans rather than sells them on the secondary market. As Spinosa explains, these loans typically come with a lower loan-to-value ratio (meaning you might not be able to borrow as much money), a different set of underwriting guidelines and a slightly higher interest rate. He adds that these lenders typically charge a variable interest rate rather than a fixed rate.

The process is a bit different for a non-U.S. citizen who wants to buy an investment property but doesn’t have a Social Security number tied to a credit report. “For us to get an approval for a foreign national, we are checking references for employment and credit references in the country of origin,” Spinosa says. A nonpermanent resident might also use this approach instead of waiting for two years of tax returns.

Of course, establishing credit and showing tax returns is less important if you’re paying cash, which some newcomers do. “There is lending available and they do take advantage of it, but it’s not their mentality [to take out a mortgage],” points out Reba Miller, owner of RP Miller Realty Group, a New York agency with over $1 billion in residential transactions. “It’s more of an American mentality.”

Michael Barbolla, head of Rutenberg Realty, one of New York City’s largest real estate brokerages, has seen several recent cash transactions involving foreign investors. “In many of these new buildings, they’re paying cash, and as long as there’s some verification of assets, the deals can run very smoothly,” he says.

 

read more…

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/buying-real-estate-immigrant-u-152517779.html

Chicago sales are soaring for $1 million and above homes | Pound Ridge Real Estate

 

Luxury home sales in the Chicago area are thriving in 2014. Home sales for the $1 million-plus segment of homes in the seven-county Chicago metro area are up 8% over 2013, according to the RE/MAX Luxury Report on Metro Chicago Real Estate.

In the first three quarters of 2014, there were 1,675 total units sold at $1 million or more in Chicago, with a median sales price of $1,350,000, which is up 3% compared to the same period in 2013.

During the third quarter, sales of luxury homes totaled 736 units, a 13% increase over the same quarter of last year, the RE/MAX report states. The median sales price for luxury properties rose 3% in the third quarter to $1,340,000.

The average time on the market for luxury properties sold during the first nine months of this year in the seven-county Chicago metropolitan area was 130 days, down from an average of 166 days in 2013.

Average market time during the third quarter was 123 days, down from 132 days in 2013.

In the City of Chicago itself, luxury sales were up 13% to 763 units through the first nine months of 2014, while the median sales price for the period was $1,400,000, up 2%.

During the third quarter, sales of $1 million or more totaled 320 units in the city, up from 270 in 2013, representing a 19% gain. The median sales price for the third quarter was $1,425,000, up 6% from the same quarter of 2013.

Sales activity in the first nine months of 2014 increased in each of the three neighborhoods that dominate Chicago’s luxury attached-home (condominiums, townhouses or co-ops) market. The Loop saw sales rise to 51 units from 44 the prior year.

In Lincoln Park, sales rose to 60 units from 33, and the Near North Side had 219 sales, up from 199. The median sales price was $1.25 million in Lincoln Park and $1.4 million in both the Loop and Near North Side.

 

read more….

 

Chicago luxury home sales booming

Share of freshman home buyers at three decade low | Bedford Corners Real Estate

 

home buyers and sellers; the series dates back to 1981. Results are representative of owner-occupants and do not include investors or vacation homes.

The long-term average in this survey, dating back to 1981, shows that four out of 10 purchases are from first-time home buyers. In this year’s survey, the share of first-time buyers dropped 5%age points from a year ago to 33%, representing the lowest share since 1987 (30%).

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, says there are many obstacles young adults are enduring on their path to homeownership.

“Rising rents and repaying student loan debt makes saving for a down payment more difficult, especially for young adults who’ve experienced limited job prospects and flat wage growth since entering the workforce,” he said. “Adding more bumps in the road, is that those finally in a position to buy have had to overcome low inventory levels in their price range, competition from investors, tight credit conditions and high mortgage insurance premiums.”

Yun said that he sees some problems being alleviated going forward.

“Stronger job growth should eventually support higher wages, but nearly half (47%) of first-time buyers in this year’s survey (43% in 2013) said the mortgage application and approval process was much more or somewhat more difficult than expected. Less stringent credit standards and mortgage insurance premiums commensurate with current buyer risk profiles are needed to boost first-time buyer participation, especially with interest rates likely rising in upcoming years.”

The household composition of buyers responding to the survey was mostly unchanged from a year ago. Sixty-five% of buyers were married couples, 16% single women, 9% single men and 8% unmarried couples.

In 2009, 60% of buyers were married, 21% were single women, 10% single men and 8% unmarried couples. Thirteen% of survey respondents were multi-generational households, including adult children, parents and/or grandparents.

 

read more….

 

 

http://www.housingwire.com/articles/31934-nar-dearth-of-first-time-buyers-plagues-housing

 

US House Prices Contribute to Global House Price Recovery | Chappaqua Real Estate

A previous blog post illustrated that US house prices are recording a range of annual gains with some areas of the country rising faster than others.

Similarly, in the context of the global economy, annual house price growth in the US has been faster than some countries while lagging other countries. The International Monetary Fund’s Global Housing Watch calculates a real seasonally adjusted house price index for 52 countries including the United States. House prices in these countries are used to calculate two separate global house price indexes. One global house price index assigns an equal weight to each country and the second global house price index is adjusted to account for the size of each country’s economic output (GDP).

Figure 1 below shows that the rate of growth recorded in the US places it in the 2nd quintile amongst countries for which house price data are available. According to the International Monetary Fund, real and seasonally adjusted annual house price growth in the US was estimated to be 3.6% between the second quarter of 2013 and the second quarter of 2014, thereby contributing to the 1.3% increase in real seasonally adjusted global house prices. The IMF comparison utilizes the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) house price index.

 

read more…

 

 

http://eyeonhousing.org/2014/11/us-house-prices-contribute-to-global-recovery/

Zillow: Millions of potential houses lost to “doubling up | Cross River Homes

now sits at 1.83 adults in 2012, up from 1.75 in 2000.

However, this phenomenon is concentrated in markets where rent has most outpaced income, notably in California and Florida.

For example, the share of Los Angeles adults in doubled up households in 2000 was 41.2%. It now is at 47.9% in 2012. This is compared to places like Columbus, Ohio, that while it did report an increase, it only increased from 19.1% to 25.8%.

“But there is a silver lining behind this data. Like a coiled spring, all of these doubled-up households represent tremendous potential energy for the market. If and when these compressed households begin to unwind and these millions of Americans do start to create their own households, demand will bounce back, possibly even causing household growth to outpace population growth,” Humphries added.

A recent report from The Demand Institute found that millennials are finally moving out of their parents’ homes. Although, they are still opting to rent rather than buy their own house.

“One important difference between millennials and young adults in previous decades is the unique financial challenges of home ownership today, resulting from graduating into a weak job market with growing student loan debt,” said Jeremy Burbank, a vice president at The Demand Institute and Nielsen. “Many millennials are open to alternative approaches to housing finance, including single-family rentals and rent/own hybrid contracts such as lease-to-own.”

“There is no magic bullet, but continued home affordability, an increasing supply of both for-rent and for-sale homes and the potential for incomes to grow more quickly as the economy recovers will all help the market to realize this potential,” Humphries added.

 

read more…

 

Zillow: Millions of potential houses lost to “doubling up”