Daily Archives: March 4, 2013

Home Prices Expected to Rise at least 3.3 Percent Annually though 2017 | Pound Ridge Homes

Home Prices Expected to Rise at least 3.3 Percent Annually though 2017

The housing recovery is expected to grow at an annualized rate 0.6 percent through the third quarter of this year, then gain momentum and prices are projected to grow 3.7 percent between the third quarters of 2013 and  2014 until settling down to 3.3 percent annual increases  over the next three years according to Fiserv, a financial services technology provider using data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).

Both home prices and home sales volumes increased steadily last year, making 2012 the first positive year for both prices and sales since the housing market crash, excluding gains induced by the home buyer tax credits in 2009 and 2010.

“Although some recent real estate activity has been speculative, it seems as if buyers have more realistic expectations about housing market returns after having lived through the largest housing market crash in U.S. history”

“2012 was the first year since 1997 that the housing market has resembled something recognizable as normal. For the past 15 years, home price changes and sales volumes have either been boosted by a bubble mentality or crushed by crash psychology,” said David Stiff, chief economist, Fiserv. “Back in 1997, housing prices grew 3 percent, just below the 5 percent long-term average rate of appreciation. From 1998 to 2006, prices appreciated at levels above 5 percent, with double-digit price increases in many of those years. Then, after 2006, the market collapsed as euphoria turned to panic. It took until the end of 2011 before housing markets finally started to stabilize. The latest Case-Shiller results show a return to a historically normal pace of price appreciation in the last year.”

The recovery in home prices has been solid and broad-based. At the end of the 2012 third quarter, prices were rising in approximately 62 percent of all U.S. metro areas, compared to 12.5 percent in the same period a year ago. Average U.S. home prices increased 3.6 percent from the third quarter of 2011 to the comparable period of 2012. Many of the metro areas that suffered the most severe declines during the housing market crash enjoyed the highest price increases in that period.

Fiserv Case-Shiller projects that by the end of 2013, home prices will be rising in nearly every metro area in the U.S. Some markets may experience short-term double-digit price jumps that could be partially reversed by price declines as large tranches of bank-owned inventory (REO) are liquidated. In other markets, price appreciation will slowly return to normal rates as home buyers regain confidence that the market has found its footing.

Stiff cautioned that the parallels to previous years should not be overstated. Unlike in 1997, there are millions of homes with delinquent mortgages, in the foreclosure process, or in REO inventories listed for sale or waiting to be sold. But many trends are positive. With both prices and mortgage payments at historic lows relative to income, Fiserv Case-Shiller expects stronger demand for housing, and the sector once again having a positive impact on the economy.

“The number of new housing units being built per household is near a record low. As momentum in the housing market builds, we will see the residential real estate sector once again make large contributions to the economic recovery. If residential investment – which encompasses all direct spending on residential real estate construction and activity – returns to its 1997 level over the next two years, then housing will boost overall economic growth by 0.5 percentage points in 2013 and 2014,” Stiff continued.

“In all of the bubble-crash markets, foreclosures will have a persistent but diminishing drag on price appreciation. Since the timing of the disposition of foreclosed properties can be highly uncertain, we will witness choppy price movements as individual metro markets stabilize. For example, in late 2011, prices in Atlanta dropped sharply because of a substantial jump in REO sales, and it is possible that we will see similar, temporary price declines in other markets as subsiding waves of foreclosed properties buffet these markets. In other markets, investor demand is quickly absorbing listed REO properties, and as a result, foreclosures are no longer pulling home prices downward,” Stiff said/

The Fiserv Case-Shiller Indexes, which include data covering thousands of zip codes, counties, metro areas and state markets, are owned and generated by Fiserv. The historical and forecast home price trend information in this report is calculated with the Fiserv proprietary Case-Shiller indexes, supplemented with data from the FHFA. The historical home price trends highlighted in this release are for the 12-month period that ended September 30, 2012. One-year forecasts are for the 12 months ending on September 30, 2013. The Fiserv Case-Shiller home price forecasts are produced by Fiserv and Moody’s Analytics.

Foreclosure Discounts are All Over the Map | Armonk Real Estate

The low prices that make foreclosures attractive to investors also make foreclosures toxic to communities and homeowners. The discount between “normal” priced homes and the prices paid for properties than have been through the foreclosure process can spell the difference between profit and loss to an investor at the same time that they drive real estate values into the ground.

As the Foreclosure Era enters its final years, the differences in foreclosure discounts vary widely across the nation, presenting opportunities to investors and wreaking havoc on homeowners simultaneously. With regional and local conditions playing a greater role than ever in shaping foreclosure supply and demand, the differences between local foreclosure discounts may be increasing to the surprise residents who rely upon reports of “national” average discounts.

FNC, one of the top sources of pricing data used by appraisers, calculated at national average discount of 12.2 percent at the end of 2012 versus 13.4 percent a year earlier. The National Association of Realtors said foreclosures sold for an average discount of 20 percent below market value in January. At the height of the mortgage crisis (2008 and 2009), foreclosed homes were typically sold at 25 percent below their estimated market value, said NAR.

Despite the progress in national average discounts, in a number of markets today foreclosures are worse now than they have ever been. A certain tier of markets, largely in the East and Midwest, are seeing discounts reach levels far below the 12.2 percent cited by FNC or the 20 percent from NAR. In real estate, where there is no national marketplace, the use of national averages sometimes can mask very different local realities.

Several factors, which differ by market, are keeping foreclosure discounts high in some markets. These include large inventories from the continued slow processing of foreclosure due to state laws; higher default and lower rents resulting from unemployment and economic fragility; less than ideal conditions for single family rentals, including low cap rates; overcapacity; and a disproportionate number of unsold damaged foreclosures (See Damaged Foreclosures Beckon Bargain-hunters); and less investor demand compared to the West and Florida, where a culture of small investors has developed and large hedge funds are active.

To help zero in on the market where foreclosure discounts are the highest, here are two tables. The first is a list of FNC’s ten highest foreclosure discounts at the end of 2011 and 2012. The second is RealtyTrac’s list of “20 best places to buy a foreclosure,” with foreclosure discounts in the third column. Some of RT’s discounts (Chicago, Philadelphia, Stamford, Cleveland, New Haven, New York) exceed 40 percent.

Q4 2012Q4 2011
Cleveland, OH23.3%25.1%
Seattle, WA24.0%25.1%
Houston, TX25.0%25.2%
Chicago, IL26.3%27.0%
Cleveland, OH26.4%22.6%
New York, NY28.2%28.6%
Baltimore, MD29.6%32.3%
Pittsburgh, PA30.2%30.6%
Boston, MA33.0%29.2%
Philadelphia, PA33.3%31.0%
Metro areaInventory months’ supplyForeclosure sales (Percentage of all sales)Average foreclosure discount (percent)Foreclosure activity (annual percentage change)
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, Fla.3423.8128.05308.71
Rochester, N.Y.783.1625.78132.61
Albany-Schenectady-Troy, N.Y.863.1735.08107.72
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa.977.740.3527.91
Lakeland, Fla.3324.3615.0995.65
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla.3224.6726.6480.16
Jacksonville, Fla.3429.2632.2951.36
Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, N.Y.926.5928.3516.51
Orlando-Kissimmee, Fla.2830.1419.2464.34
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, Ill.-Ind.-Wis.3630.0446.0330.21
El Paso, Texas158.7917.893.42
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, Fla.2928.730.5836.17
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md.4211.9143.1727.01
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Pa.-N.J.3411.8739.737.21
Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, Ohio-Pa.6113.6132.6315.32
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, Conn.109.8352.2249.37
Syracuse, N.Y.391.621.2557.4
Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, Ohio3221.6446.9718.83
New Haven-Milford, Conn.913.6641.8754.18
Indianapolis-Carmel, Ind.2618.9735.5138.04