Daily Archives: May 24, 2011

More renters qualify to purchase Bedford real estate, incomes grow as prices fall | Finding your Bedford NY Home

NAR sees many reasons to purchase a home in Bedford NY.  Here is the list.

 

  • Many factors have increased the number of renter households qualified to purchase a home in 2010 versus 2005: 1) incomes have increased, 2) population has grown, 3) prices have fallen, and 4) mortgage rates are lower.
  • Incomes have increased.  For example, 25 percent of renter households earned more than $50,000 in 2005.  In 2009, the share had increased to 28 percent of renter households.
  • Population has also grown.  In 2005 there were approximately 36.8 million renter households compared to 38.8 million renter households in 2009[1].
  • The tables below show the data underlying the change in required income.  Because of lower home prices and mortgage rates, qualifying income required to purchase a median priced home has fallen from $56,600 in 2005 to $40,300 in 2010.

dyk052311a

  • Finally, based on all of these factors, we see that while 21 percent of renters qualified to buy the median priced home in 2005, 39 percent of renters would qualify in 2010[2].  Translating these numbers into households, 7.7 million renters qualified to purchase the median priced home in 2005 while in 2010, 15 million renter households qualify[3].

dyk052311b

  • If you’re interested in exploring how much of an affect changing prices, mortgage rates, and down payments have on the number of renters who qualify to buy a home, download this tool.  It allows you to adjust the home price, mortgage rate, and down payment percent to see how those changes affect the share and number of renters qualified to buy a home.
  • Have interest in seeing how these factors affect affordability in your state or metro area?  Contact NAR Research for more information on constructing a tool with income and population data that is specific to your area.

[1]The number of renter households used here is derived from the American Community Survey which is consistent with the rest of the data used in this study. The ACS is not the official source of US population figures. For more information, see: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/guidance_for_data_users/guidance_main/.

[2] This calculation assumes that income distribution in 2010 is the same as it was in 2009.

[3] These calculations assume that potential buyers meet credit qualifications and have sufficient cash on hand to close a transaction.  Lending standards, credit quality, and access to funds will affect the number of households who will be able to buy a home.

 

This article is the second in a series.  The first article can be found here.

Mapping leaps and a vision for a national real estate registry | Inman News for South Salem real estate buyers

Mapping leaps and a vision for a national real estate registry

Q-and-A with GIS pioneer Donald Cooke

By Inman News, Monday, May 23, 2011.

Inman News™

Donald CookeDonald Cooke

Decades before Google Maps and other online mapping technologies would transform real estate search, Donald Cooke was plugging away on a U.S. Census Bureau project that would pave the way for digitalization of geographic information systems industry.

A proponent of making government information more accessible to the public, Cooke participated on a pioneering Census Bureau digital database project in the late 1960s. In 1980 he founded Geographic Data Technology Inc., a company that was contracted by the Census Bureau to digitize data sets.

Fifteen years ago, Cooke discussed advances in digital mapping and geocoding during the premier Real Estate Connect conference in San Francisco.

In 2004, Cooke’s firm was acquired by Tele Atlas, a company that TomTom acquired in 2008. The company supplies data to Google Maps and to other providers of mobile and online mapping services, and also provides technology for automotive navigation systems.

Cooke now serves as community mapping evangelist for ESRI, a GIS firm based in Redlands, Calif.

He reflected on the past 15 years of technological innovation, and what’s in store, during a Q-and-A with Inman News.

Q: What was most memorable to you about your participation in the first Real Estate Connect event, 15 years ago?

A: I was honored to be at the event and impressed that digital mapping, GIS and geocoding were recognized as subjects pertinent to the real estate industry.

 
Q: What attracted you to participate in Real Estate Connect in those early days?

A: Commercial use of geospatial technologies was starting to take off in the mid-90s and it was appealing to present at a subject-area conference as opposed to the technology-focused GIS and Business Geographics gatherings.

Q: What was most unexpected to you about how technology has transformed the real estate industry in the last 15 years, or how technology has transformed society in general?

A: The impact of the Internet and World Wide Web were surprises to me. I had used email and FTP for many years and had seen the Mosaic browser in the early 1990s. But I had no clue of the effect that Netscape would have when it rolled out about a year before the Real Estate Connect conference and the age of a commercial Web began.

I’m sometimes cast as a visionary, but I had no idea of the extent to which these technologies would change our lives. I suppose some pundits immediately envisioned sites like Wikipedia and Zillow, but it sure wasn’t me.

Q: What current technological trend is most interesting to you, and why?

A: Well, it’s really the convergence of several trends: Smartphones and iPads, cloud computing, ubiquitous high-speed connectivity, and data and applications manifesting themselves as services. I don’t think any sector of computing will be untouched by this.

Twenty years ago, if I wanted a map on my computer I would go to a portal, find and download a shapefile, and run some GIS software. Now, my smartphone reports where I am and a server somewhere in the cloud ships me a dozen little image files that assemble themselves into a map on my device.

Or the server sends a packet of vectors describing my neighborhood and software on my phone renders a 3-D image of my surroundings. The idea of software or data sets being shipped in a box is dead. It’s a new world of free or rented services.

Q: What has surprised you about things that haven’t changed as much for the real estate industry in the past 15 years? What do you believe are barriers to change, if any?

A: For me anyway, the importance of going onsite and kicking the tires won’t ever change. Plus, the opinions of experienced real estate people are invaluable, especially when transferring to a new part of the country.

I’m shopping for a house now and having an agent who grew up in town and has lived here for over 50 years is very reassuring.

Q: How has technology shaped or changed consumer behavior in the past 15 years?

A: I’m amazed at how accustomed I am to replacing technology like a smartphone every couple of years. I look back just a few years and I can’t believe I thought whatever I was using at the time was great.

Of course, the bulk of my costs go to connectivity, which makes it all the easier to keep on upgrading. It’s funny — cars last a lot longer nowadays but electronics have a useful life of 18-24 months.

Q: How has consumer behavior shaped or changed technology in the past 15 years?

A: I’ve grown to expect that the information I need for a buying decision is on the Web somewhere; I just need to find it. Some companies seem to be making this easier for me and also provide distractions and add-ons that are occasionally well thought out and welcome. They’ve recognized my buying behavior and are responding to it in very positive ways.

Q: If real estate consumers are much better informed about real estate than they were 15 years ago, why did the nation experience such a massive downturn in the real estate sector? What fatal flaws or gaps in real estate information for consumers remain, if any?

A: No matter how well-informed consumers were, unless they took a very broad look — and recognized a bubble — they were likely to participate in an inevitable downturn. If they were buying and flipping real estate, then they were more driven by greed than by dispassionate, informed decision-making. So I’m not convinced that access to real estate information was a factor one way or the other in the downturn.

Q: How could technology be used to help prevent a future real estate or economic downturn of this magnitude?

A: Maybe I’m shortsighted but I think downturns are created by human factors and are perhaps exacerbated by technology. We might be able to moderate downturns by inserting technology that would delay stock trades by a minute. But what are the chances of ever doing that?

Q: How has the pace and cost of technological innovation changed in the past 15 years?

A: The future seems to come on faster and faster — sometimes so fast that I wonder if it’s going to reverse the aging process. Something new comes along in two years that I wouldn’t have thought possible for another five years. It’s like getting three years younger!

Q: Will technology drive down the average cost of real estate services that consumers pay? Has it already? Will it improve the quantity and quality of real estate service that they receive? Has it already?

A: We’re still operating a 21st century land economy with an 18th century land-recordation system. We have to research deeds filed on paper in hundreds of the counties in the nation. A uniform title system — a national cadastre (real estate registry) — might save some time and costs, but I doubt that I’ll live to see it.

Q: What are the red flags with increasing use, reliance of technology in real estate and other industries, if any?

A: One might be the public relying on "Zestimates" (property value estimates) as gospel and arguing with municipal tax authorities’ assessments. While I use Zillow a lot, I think it’s a very disruptive force.

Q: Technology can be an equalizer, by making massive amounts of information accessible to many, and at the same time can empower and facilitate social change, and organized and virtually spontaneous group actions — even political revolutions. Because so many on the planet are connected by wire or wirelessly to one another, what potential do you see for online networks on a global scale?

A: The potential has been realized already. I wonder if the founders of Facebook and Twitter realized their products would be instrumental in overthrowing governments?

Q: What is the as-yet-untapped potential and what does it represent for technological innovators?

A: There’s a potential to level the playing field and provide more universal opportunities in, say, Africa through ubiquitous access to global networks, but a lot more than technology has to change for this to happen

Q: For industries such as real estate?

A: The ability of a country to record and guarantee title to land holdings is utterly fundamental to economic development in emerging countries. The technology to do this is becoming cheaper and more accessible. Establishing cadastres in emerging countries will not only support development but make a robust real estate market possible.

Q: What are some overarching trends in technology innovation and adoption that you would expect to see continued, evolved or launched in the next 15 years?

A: Software and data migrating to cloud-based services, with ubiquitous access on affordable, pocket-sized machines. Will people learn to use information critically and wisely? We’ll see.

Q: Any other thoughts about the past 15 years in technology and real estate, in terms of innovation, lessons learned, trends established?

A: I’m shopping for a house, and much as I may have (said about) Zillow in my responses, I’m glad it’s there and available as a tool for me to use!

Be a part of Real Estate Connect’s 15th anniversary — the next Real Estate Connect event is scheduled from July 27-29, 2011, at the Hilton San Francisco Union Square hotel (more information).

Contact Inman News:
Email

Email

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor

Copyright 2011 Inman News

All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

Listingbook service: real estate leads for $1 apiece | Inman News for Chappaqua NY realtors

Listingbook service: real estate leads for $1 apiece

Agents can pay for prospects targeted by ZIP code or street

By Inman News, Monday, May 23, 2011.

Inman News™

Listingbook has launched a lead generation service for real estate agents, the company announced today.

The service, MyQuickFarm.com, offers exclusive leads for $1 per lead with a minimum order of 100 leads. The service is available to agents using Listingbook’s client management and direct marketing platform; the leads are automatically loaded to the agent’s account.

Agents choose the ZIP code or street they want to target and the service sends the agent an exclusive list with each prospective client’s full name, email address, and home address.

Listingbook then automatically invites each homeowner to open a Listingbook account to see the market value of their home. Once they open an account, the agent can connect with and qualify the new prospects, the company said.

more…

To continue reading sign in to your Premium Membership Premium Member account.

Premium Membership Premium Members have full access to all news archives.

Buy Now Purchase 1-year Premium Membership – $149.95

Copyright 2011 Inman News

All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

Draft bill would hike FHA loan down payments to 5%, slash loan limits | Inman News for Armonk NY real estate buyers

Draft bill would hike FHA loan down payments to 5%, slash loan limits

Legislation will likely draw fire from industry groups, Senate Democrats

By Ken Harney, Monday, May 23, 2011.

Inman News™

Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee have drafted legislation that would raise the minimum down payment for FHA mortgages to 5 percent, cut FHA loan limits in most markets, and move the Agriculture Department’s rural housing program to FHA’s parent agency, HUD.

Though the draft bill has not been introduced, titled or assigned a number, it is expected to be the main subject of a hearing Wednesday before the Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing and Community Opportunity, chaired by Rep. Judy Biggert, R-Ill. After that, the bill is likely to be formally introduced and sped through subcommittee and committee votes and head for action by the full House.

The text of the draft bill appears to be a partial answer from House Republicans to the Obama administration’s call earlier this year for a smaller federal government footprint in housing.

By lowering maximum FHA loan limits in large numbers of local areas — well below even the limits that are already scheduled to kick in Oct. 1 — the bill would squeeze down FHA loan volume across the country, cutting a resource for some home purchasers who can’t obtain a conventional mortgage.

more…

To continue reading sign in to your Premium Membership Premium Member account.

Premium Membership Premium Members have full access to all news archives.

Buy Now Purchase 1-year Premium Membership – $149.95

Copyright 2011 Inman News

All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

Rocky road ahead for Pound Ridge real estate recovery | Pound Ridge homes for sale

Of all the economic news last week, the fall in unemployment claims had the most positive impact. It’s great to see them come down, and my work suggests that May is on track for a 275,000 gain in payrolls, which is well above current consensus.

 

Claims fell by 29,000 to 409,000 last week, the second improvement in a row after a couple of sad-sack weeks that were muddied by special events like a new emergency benefits program in Oregon and the layoffs resulting from the parts shortage in Japan.

All told, over the past two weeks claims have fallen by 69,000 — which nearly erases the 74,000 spike in claims in the prior two weeks. In short, we’re back to where we were a month ago.

Still, we have two big problems looming like Godzilla on stilts.

First is manufacturing. The Philadelphia Fed Index showed once again the manufacturing recovery is losing speed. Global demand is still strong, especially in emerging markets, but check this out: the index has fallen to a seven-month low of 3.9 from 18.5 in April. And the sub-indexes were equally terrible, showing that new orders are down, shipments are down, prices paid are down and prices received are down.

That’s a lot of downs. It means that manufacturing is still expanding but at a slooooower and sloooooower pace. This kind of data says the recovery may be in gear but its durability is in question.

Second, we have the U.S. existing home sales data, which clanked a lot more than expected in April — down 0.8%. That was the first decline since February and flew in the face of two straight advances in pending home sales.

Bottom line: The big news events of the week fit together. Until the housing market improves, the lightly-skilled workers who make up most of the current hard-core unemployed will not find the kinds of jobs that push wages higher and juice consumer demand. That’s keeeping a lid on U.S. economic growth, making manufacturers stumble around.

Still, there is a big difference between a slowdown and a contraction. Slowdowns, which is what we are facing now, can serve to stretch out an expansion, albeit at a painfully sluggish pace.

So why hasn’t the market spiraled down into a darkened abyss with flames spewing out from its engines?

Targeted Internet Marketing for the Bedford NY Realtor | Bedford Real Estate on the Internet

Guest Post by Daniel McElroy

There is no doubt that Internet marketing has reached a crossroads. While social media platforms, such as Facebook and Twitter, have allowed businesses and brands unprecedented access to consumers, rising concerns over privacy    means that advertisers need to strike a delicate balance between ever-more targeted approaches and maintaining their customers’ trust. As former Google CEO Eric Schmidt famously put it while discussing Google’s own targeting policies, “Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.”

The history of targeted Internet marketing could perhaps be best described as a game of cat-and-mouse, where technological advances, consumer smarts, and government regulations chase one another up to that “creepy line” that continually gets redrawn. As technology moves faster, and the stakes for both marketers and consumers grow ever higher, both could benefit from a survey of the Internet marketing landscape: past, present, and future.

The Past: A World of Spam and Pop-Ups
Throughout the history of marketing, brands have attempted to effectively (and economically) reach potential customers while preventing their message from falling on deaf ears. The advent of the Internet age promised marketers an opportunity to finally place their message directly in front of those people who cared the most about their products. More than TV ads, more than mass mailers, more than print advertising, the Internet promised to replace blanket marketing with targeted campaigns.

However, technology needed to catch up. The early days of Internet marketing was still very much a one-way street. Marketers depended on the digital equivalent of junk mail and flyers to clog users’ inboxes or pop-up ads placed on websites supposedly popular with the same demographic as their products.

The low cost  of such digital marketing was attractive, but the actual results were arguably not any better than what could be achieved in the offline world.

The Present: Social Media Fever
Today’s Internet presents unprecedented opportunities for making marketing a two-way street. Technology and demand have met up in a landscape that is still under-regulated. As a result, businesses are pushing the envelope in a mad dash to identify and capture as many marketing impressions — and as much users’ information — as possible.

We are living in a world where marketers collect “likes” and “followers” as trophies. Marketers set traps with advertorial content, incentives, and any other bait available. All of these efforts are designed to make users click so that their own “likes” can be revealed for future targeted marketing messages.

At present, marketers have a clear advantage over consumers, who lack a full understanding of (or concern about) how their online behavior is targeted by marketing companies.

Future Prediction: The Customer Is King
In actuality, this prediction is the same reality that has always existed. No amount of marketing will sell a product that is unwanted by consumers. And targeting that crosses the line into “creepy” will have customers running the other direction in droves. The future will no doubt see a rise in more savvy consumers, armed with a fundamentally stronger understanding of how Internet marketing works. They will also have better tools to protect themselves from prying marketers, while government regulations will undoubtedly catch up with shadier industry practices.

How should marketers meet this future? With transparency, a compelling message, and the understanding that the customer is always right. No amount of SEO tricks, stealth cookies, Facebook “Likes,” and clever Tweets can replace satisfying consumers who want to follow and be loyal to a brand that targets their needs, desires, and interests without alienating them with shady practices.

Subscribe by Email –>

Seth’s Blog: Legacy issues for the Bedford NY Prudential Douglas Elliman realtor

What does your organization do with legacy products and services? Things you started that never really caught on, or died out slowly over time?

That's a very easy way to judge the posture and speed of a brand. If there's a one-way track–stuff gets added, but it never gets taken away–then the ship is going to get slower and heavier and become much harder to handle until it eventually sinks.

How long did it take Detroit to take the ashtrays out of cars? The single-sex admission policy at the club? How many people who use your website need to speak up on behalf of a button or a policy for you to persist in keeping it there? How long before you cancel the Sisterhood meetings that are now attended by just three people?

Either you're focused on maintaining the legacy features or you're focused on figuring out how to replace them. Driving with your eyes on the rearview mirror is difficult indeed.

In a world of little competition, legacy features are something worth keeping. No sense alienating loyal customers.

But we don't live in a world of little competition. The faster your industry moves, the more likely others are willing to live without the legacy stuff and create a solution that's going to eclipse what you've got, legacies and all.