Student housing ripe for investment
Private sector eyes profits as government budgets shrink
About a decade ago, when looking for a real estate investment trust (REIT) to put into my stock portfolio, I chose American Campus Communities Inc., an Austin, Texas-based company that specialized in developing and managing student housing.
I enjoyed the REIT dividend and was pleased that the stock held its own through the heart of the recession when the rest of the market tumbled over a cliff like a long line of lemmings.
Otherwise, I really didn’t pay much attention to the student housing sector; then over the past year a couple of items caught my eye. First, toward the end of 2010, Campus Crest Communities Inc. of Charlotte, N.C., a student housing REIT unknown to me at the time, went public, generating net proceeds of $350.6 million.
Then I stumbled upon an interview with a REIT analyst, who, when asked by the interviewer about his favorite companies in the apartment sector, mentioned the two best-known student housing REITs: ACC and Education Realty Trust Inc. of Memphis, Tenn.
Since Campus Crest was new news to me, I decided to give the company a call to see what was up with student housing, which can be defined as off-campus, for-profit housing for college students, or cooperative developments with universities to create student housing on-campus. Others who are independently curious, like me, can also check them out online. There are ressources available at downingstudents.com/student-accommodation/cambridge/ among other great choices. So what is Campus Crest, what do they do, and how can it benefit me aswell?
First, a little background: Campus Crest was founded in 2004 by two Duke University business school buddies, Michael Hartnett and Ted Rollins. The latter serves as co-chairman and CEO, while Hartnett shares co-chairman responsibilities plus sits in as chief investment officer.
The company’s May recap of first-quarter business reported average occupancy had risen 100 basis points to 88.6 percent as compared to the same period a year ago, which seemed to be an average performance considering the bigger competition, ACC and Education Realty, were boasting average occupancy above 90 percent. A little better was same-store net operating income, up 5.1 percent as compared to first-quarter 2010.
The company suffered a bit of softness during the recession, which was surprising, as it appeared the sector was almost recession-proof.
Not recession-proof, Rollins corrected me, “recession-resistant.”
Retail, industrial, office, lodging and even the apartment property sectors experienced, as Rollins said, “a material shift in occupants,” which was a technocrat’s way of saying everybody escaped town leaving nothing behind but empty space. That didn’t happen to student housing. However, due to one or both parents either losing a job or just the fear of unemployment, student decisions on housing were delayed. Secondly, rental rates flat-lined.
Heading out of the recession, as the economy recovers, “We are now seeing less price sensitivity,” Rollins said. “We see a little uptick — after all, education is a fundamental expense for mom and dad.”
Except for the apartment sector, owners of hotels, industrial buildings, offices and shopping centers still have to worry about whether the trend lines going forward will be beneficial to their sectors and empty space worries will finally dissipate.
Here’s where student housing goes its own rebellious and separate way from its brethren in the property sector. The tea leaves portend munificence.
Demographically speaking, the children of the baby boomers (echo boomers) are reaching the peak of their college attendance years; a higher percentage of high school attendees are graduating; a higher percentage of graduates are electing to attend college full time; and the average time period that young adults attend college has been stretching from four years to five years and beyond.
“We have this demographic wave of echo boomers that is almost the size of baby boomers,” said Paula Poskon, “a REIT analyst with Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc. “Projected college enrollment is predicted to be quite strong for probably the next decade.”
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, college student enrollment will continue to increase through 2019.
All of this means universities have to prepare for more students and how to house them. Unfortunately, many schools are already working from a position of weakness, and with state and city budget crises, the situation won’t get any better.
“Universities are ill-equipped to meet this growing demand because they have housing inventory that is old and obsolete, and they don’t have the money, expertise or desire to build new housing,” said Haendel St. Juste, a REIT analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods.
“In addition, the large state schools are dealing with budget caps. When you talk about funding to build new housing, this is not at the top of the priority list.”
This is where the private sector comes in.
“The student housing REITs have the development capability, but more importantly they have access to capital via the public market. And also, because they are large, established organizations they have access to construction financing to meet this need for housing,” St. Juste said.
While new construction elsewhere remains dismal, Rollins said his company is completing six projects this summer and will be kicking off another six to eight developments in the autumn.
“Student housing remains a highly fragmented industry,” Poskon said. “There are three publicly traded REITs, but there are a whole slew of local and regional players, some of which are sizable” — which can be a problem because it is relatively easy to overbuild small college markets.
Student housing revenues are less affected by economic forces such as job growth, changing interest rates, the spread between cost to own vs. rent, and the strength or weakness of the homebuying market, Poskon said. “Most people think about student housing as a tangent to multifamily, but the drivers are different: enrollment for student housing, and job growth for multifamily.”
And, oh, by the way, none of this should hurt the small-time real estate investor who buys a house or two near a campus for student rentals. The evolution of students’ housing needs hasn’t changed since the 1950s: freshman live in dorms; sophomores and juniors stay in dorms or move to apartments; seniors and grad students find a rental house.
There’s no new learning curve for this business.
Steve Bergsman is a freelance writer in Arizona and author of several books. His latest book, “Growing Up Levittown: In a Time of Conformity, Controversy and Cultural Crisis,” is now available for sale on Amazon.com.
Tag Archives: Mt Kisco Homes for Sale
Mt Kisco NY Homes | Borders Books Liquidation Appears Imminent – Bedford-Katonah, NY Patch
Borders Book & Music is likely to be liquidated later this week, resulting in the closing of the Mount Kisco store, along with its remaining locations, The Wall Street Journal has reported.
The book store, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in February, failed to get a buyer to save it, and will present a liquidation takeover offer from companies Hilco Merchant Resources and Gordon Brothers, the paper reported, which would be on Thursday unless a last-minute buyer emerges. In that case, according to the WSJ, there would then be an auction for its assets.
In a press statement, posted by the Journal, Borders announced that it expects to start the liquidation process at the end of this week, with a phased shut down into late September.
In response, several of Borders’ creditors have made objections to the proposed liquidation, Bloomberg reported Monday afternoon, with one argument being that there would not be anyone to take over its business contracts.
If the Mount Kisco store is closed, it will leave the community without a store for new books.
Borders would become the most recent of several former book stores in the village to go to a retail grave.
In 1995, the established independent Fox & Sutherland shuttered, but was soon replaced by another independent store, Mount Kisco Book Company, according to The New York Times. Just months after opening, on Nov. 25, 1996, that store was the victim of a major fire that disrupted stores on its block, The Times reported, but was able to get back on its feet and reopen at the former Fox & Sutherland site, on South Moger Avenue with charitable local support.
Mount Kisco Book Company, which reportedly struggled during its existence, pulled the plug in 2000, with multiple media outlets at the time, ironically, reporting the emergence of Borders—reported as having opened in 1997—being a contributing factor.
The loss of Borders will also serve as a blow to residents in New Castle and Bedford, many of whom have it as their closest book store. Just two years ago, New Castle residents lost Second Story Book Shop, which was located in downtown Chappaqua. That store, The Times reported, was a major fixture locally, even bringing in former President Bill Clinton for a signing of his book when it was released in 2004.
Mt Kisco NY Homes finds 10 Helpful Title Tips From Top-Viewed Blog Posts | Mt Kisco NY Real Estate
Mt Kisco Realtor finds 4 Indispensable Tips On Viral Marketing That Cannot Be Ignored | Mt Kisco NY real estate for sale
Mt Kisco NY Real Estate Infographic: Do-It-Yourself Guide to Infographics | Social Media for Mt Kisco NY Homes
Mt Kisco NY Homes looks at the STIHL Wood Boss Chain Saw | Mt Kisco NY real estate for sale
MS 271 STIHL WOOD BOSS® Chain Saw Built for Tough Tasks STIHL MS 271 chain saw brings low-emission, fuel-efficient technology to a variety of users
VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. — Built tough for storm cleanup, tree felling, and firewood cutting, the MS 271 STIHL WOOD BOSS® chain saw is designed with improved ergonomics and equipped with a low-emission, fuel-efficient engine. The STIHL MS 271 produces 50 percent lower emissions, reduces fuel consumption, and delivers 20 percent longer running times as compared to similar traditional 2-stroke STIHL chain saws.
Designed with comfort in mind for farmers, landowners, tree farmers, firewood cutters and tree service ground crews, the STIHL MS 271 utilizes a compact, ergonomic design with an advanced anti-vibration system to help reduce operator fatigue while providing optimum control. A side-access chain tensioner makes for easy chain adjustment, and the pre-separation air filtration system offers greater cleaning efficiency and longer filter life.
For more information on the STIHL MS 271 chain saw, visit http://www.stihlusa.com/chainsaws/MS271.html.
About STIHL Inc.
STIHL is pleased to support the work of Independent We Stand, the Tree Research and Education Endowment Fund (TREE Fund), International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), the Tree Care Industry Association (TCIA), National FFA, Professional Landcare Network (PLANET), the American Tree Farm System (ATFS), and the National Association of State Park Directors.This press release is presented without editing for your information. MOTHER EARTH NEWS does not recommend, approve or endorse the products and/or services offered. You should use your own judgment and evaluate products and services carefully before deciding to purchase.
Mt Kisco NY Real Estate looks at Top 25 Social Media Blogs For Businesses | Flowtown for Mt Kisco NY Homes for sale
Mt Kisco NY Real Estate news | Albany rent deal leaves unanswered questions | Crain’s New York Business for Mt Kisco NY Homes
The state legislature reached a tentative agreement to extend New York City’s rent laws, but a cloud of uncertainty still looms over thousands of regulated units affected by a 2-year-old court decision that many hoped would be addressed during the session.
Sources said there were some discussions on how to deal with the fall out from a 2009 Appellate Division of New York’s Supreme Court ruling that owners of Stuyvesant Town/Peter Cooper Village had illegally deregulated units when receiving a tax break known as a J-51. That decision, which affected thousands of apartments beyond those in that sprawling complex, left the door open to reregulating units and reimbursing tenants for overcharges. But since then, neither the courts nor state housing authorities have reached any type of agreement about how to implement the ruling. A Republican senator introduced a bill that would have allowed landlords to pay the taxes while not repaying tenants for overcharges but it failed to gain traction.
“It was a disappointment that they didn’t address the Roberts decision,” said Steven Spinola, president of the Real Estate Board of New York, which represents landlords, referring to the common name of court ruling which stems from the last name of one of the tenants, Amy Roberts, who brought the suit. “”We really think there needs to be a decision by the Legislature since the courts don’t know what to do.”
He added that the Legislature also failed to extend the J-51 program, which extends tax breaks for making building repairs and expires this December. Mr. Spinola hopes legislators will return later this year for a special session, during which the program can be extended. He added that legislators could also address the Roberts decision at that time.
Meanwhile, legislators agreed to grant some small increases in tenant protection as they extended the current rent laws. Presently, landlords can deregulate a unit when the apartment is vacant and rent goes over $2,000 a month or when a family’s income goes above $175,000 and the rent is at least $2,000 a month. Under the deal, the rent limit increases to $2,500 a month in both instances and the family can earn up to $200,000 a year.
“The agreement is much better than it could have been,” said Maggie Russell-Ciardi, executive Director of Tenants & Neighbors, a tenant advocacy organization. “Of course, it wasn’t everything tenants wanted.”
In other developments, the Legislature also agreed to extend the 421-A program which gives developers temporary property tax exemptions to build affordable housing.
“We are obviously pleased with that,” Mr. Spinola said. “It is critical to get building going again.”
Redraw title for proper inheritance | Inman News in Mt Kisco NY
![]()
DEAR BENNY: My parents (now in their 80s) own a fourplex with my brother and his wife as joint tenants with right of survivorship. They agreed to a 50/50 partnership at the beginning. Both couples agree that if they died their respective 50 percent share would go to their respective estate and not to the remaining partners.
Question 1: Shouldn’t they have the title redrawn as tenants in common to do what they initially intended?
Question 2: If my brother and his wife refuse to go along with changing the title to the property to tenants in common (which they may not want to do), can my parents proceed to change it without their partners’ consent?
My brother and his wife have made it very clear that they want their 50 percent share to go to their kids in the case of their death, but they may be banking on acquiring 100 percent of property upon my parents’ death (because of their advanced age) if title stays the way it is. –Meg
DEAR MEG: The fourplex, in my opinion, is titled in a very confusing way. When property is held as joint tenants (or preferably joint tenants with rights of survivorship), on the death of one joint tenant the property automatically is vested in the name of the survivor. We lawyers call this “title by operation of law.” So if X and Y own title as joint tenants, when X dies, Y becomes the sole owner. No probate is required.
In your parents’ situation, what happens if your dad dies? Presumably, the remaining three owners remain in title, again as joint tenants.
But if the intention of the parties was their respective heirs are to inherit the property on their death, that will not happen the way title is currently held.
The best way to accomplish that is as follows: “mom and dad as joint tenants with rights of survivorship as to their interest and as tenants in common with brother and wife, who hold title as joint tenants with rights of survivorship as to their interest.”
Your parents should discuss this with their son. You should stay out of this issue, other than to show them my answer in this column. But if your brother is unwilling to cooperate, it is possible for your parents — without their son’s permission — to break the joint tenancy arrangement and change it to a tenant-in-common title.
I have done this several times for clients, under similar situations. A joint tenancy can be unilaterally broken. However, your parents should consult their own attorney to assist them in the proper procedure and drafting of the new title arrangement.
DEAR BENNY: In a recent column, you indicated that a giftor’s lifetime tax exemption is $1 million. However, after searching this out, I believe that for 2011 the lifetime gift tax exemption is $5 million, which is the same as the federal estate tax exemption. Am I wrong? –Frank
DEAR FRANK: You are correct. For years 2011 and 2012, the lifetime gift tax exemption is $5 million. This is the same amount as the federal estate tax exemption. What this means is that in your lifetime, you can give up to that amount. However, there is a catch: This amount will then be subtracted from your estate tax exemption.
That does not mean, however, that you should give all that money to your children tomorrow. In addition to the lifetime exemption, you are still entitled to the annual gift tax exclusion, which for 2011 is $13,000. That means that you can give up to that amount to anyone and everyone, and neither you nor the recipients will have to file any tax returns on that nor will they have to pay any tax. And the $13,000 annual exclusion does not reduce your lifetime $5 million gift and estate tax exemption.
This is beneficial for parents who want to help their married children buy a house. For example, if you have a married son and a married daughter, you can give each one of them $13,000 (or $26,000 per couple). You can also give the same amount to all of your grandchildren.
It should be noted that although the $5 million gift and estate tax exemption passed by Congress is the law until 2012, there is a good chance that the exemption will continue in at least that amount in later years. But stay tuned: Congress is completely unpredictable.
DEAR BENNY: We want to gift our daughter a house that we paid $123,000 for in 1999. We made approximately $20,000 in improvements to the house. Because of the depressed housing market, we believe the value of the house remains at the price we paid for it. Because our daughter suffered a stroke, she is on Social Security disability and is unable to work. What effect, if any, would gifting the house to her have on her Social Security disability? And what effect, if any, would it have on us? –Ardath
DEAR ARDATH: My first question is why you want to even consider gifting the house to your daughter. Are you trying to reduce your estate? Do you have another house — and sufficient assets — so as to live comfortably?
Regardless of your motives, there are several issues you must consider.
First are tax issues: If you gift the property to your daughter, she will receive your tax basis, which you have indicated is approximately the cost. Tax basis is the value of the property when it was bought, plus any improvements made over the years. When the property is sold, you have an adjusted sales price. That is the sales price less such items as closing costs and real estate commissions. Profit is determined by subtracting the basis from the adjusted sales price.
No big issue there except that if you instead keep the property and leave it to her when you die, she will receive a basis stepped up to the appreciated value as of the date of your death. Oversimplified, this could mean a substantial savings in capital gains tax.
I recognize that readers will say: Well, if she owns and lives in the house for at least two out of the five years before the property is sold, the daughter can claim the up-to-$250,000 exclusion of gain, and may not have to pay any capital gains tax.
That is correct, but with two caveats: First, the daughter is disabled and may not be able to live in the house for that length of time. Second, Congress may tamper with the exclusion and it may not be with us in the years to come.
Second, there may be gift tax issues. Because the value of the gift would be greater than the annual exclusion (which is $13,000 per person), you will need to report the gift to the extent the current value is greater than $26,000 — i.e., $13,000 each. So you would each need to report around $50,000 against their $5 million lifetime exemption. Depending on your total net worth, this may not be a problem for you.
However, the bigger issue is that it is very likely that if your daughter is given the property, her government benefits could be reduced or terminated. There may be an exception for a personal residence so that it may not be counted as an asset for purposes of determining her qualification for disability benefits.
You must consult with an attorney in the state from which your daughter is receiving benefits (or will receive them after she moves to your house. The laws very from state to state on this.
So, before you make your final decision, talk with an attorney on all these issues. You don’t want to do something that can hurt both you and your daughter financially, even though it sounds like a good deed.
Benny L. Kass is a practicing attorney in Washington, D.C., and Maryland. No legal relationship is created by this column. Questions for this column can be submitted to benny@inman.com.
Mount Kisco Realtor Sees Downturn Lasting Years | Mt Kisco NY Real Estate
Real estate downturn's impacts to linger for years
Commercial property owners
By Matt Carter, Monday, May 16, 2011.
WASHINGTON — The repercussions of the biggest economic downturn since the Great Depression continue to ripple through multifamily and commercial property markets, and real estate agents and brokers helping their clients manage their investments need to stay on top of economic, regulatory, and legislative issues affecting lending, tax policy, health care and energy.
Charles Achilles, chief legislative and research officer for the Institute of Real Estate Management, summarized a dizzying array of issues facing commercial property investors, many of which will also have an impact on residential housing markets.
For multifamily and commercial property owners, loans remain hard to come by, Achilles said Friday, speaking at the National Association of Realtors’ midyear conference.
Debt and taxes
The nation’s growing debt, changes to the federal tax system, and implementation of health care reform also have implications for commercial property investors, Achilles said.
Declining property tax and other revenues have 35 states projecting budget shortfalls totaling $82 billion in 2012, Achilles said, and could produce "hundreds" of bankruptcies at the municipal level in the next 12 to 18 months.
Last year’s health care reform bill could put additional stress on state budgets, because it increases the scope of Medicaid coverage without providing revenue beyond 2016.
A number of states have sued the federal government, with mixed results, meaning the U.S. Supreme Court will probably have to weigh in on the issue, possibly by the end of the year.
The bottom line for commercial brokers and their clients is that in areas where state and local governments are struggling, tax increases may be inevitable and the potential for economic growth is reduced.
"You have to ask yourself, ‘Where are the jobs? Are there jobs where my portfolio is located?’ " Achilles said.
The federal deficit, which grew from 33 percent of gross domestic product in 2001 to 62 percent in 2010, could ultimately raise the cost of borrowing and curb economic growth, Achilles said.
A recent report by a bipartisan deficit reduction commission, the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, projects that by 2025, federal tax revenue will only pay the interest on the national debt.
The commission recommended returning spending to 2008 levels by 2013, and eliminating hundreds of tax breaks that reduce tax revenue by more than $1 trillion a year.
Achilles said some of the commission’s recommendations — including reducing the number of income tax brackets from six to three, and eliminating the alternative minimum tax (AMT) — would be good for commercial property owners.
But other recommendations — including treating capital gains that are currently taxed at 15 percent as ordinary income, and eliminating itemized deductions other than the mortgage interest deduction (MID) (see related article) — could have negative implications for commercial property owners, he said.
"The only difference between death and taxes is death doesn’t get worse every time Congress meets," Achilles said, quoting Will Rogers.
The commission’s final report recommended that the mortgage interest deduction be changed to a 12 percent nonrefundable tax credit, with only the interest paid on debt of up to $500,000 on a principal residence eligible. Homeowners are currently allowed to claim an itemized deduction for interest paid on total mortgage debt of up to $1 million on both their principal and second homes.
Although the report was not adopted by the full commission, Achilles said "it has some legs" in Congress.
NAR strongly opposes any changes to the mortgage interest deduction, saying such changes could further depress home prices by up to 15 percent.
For now, Congress and the Obama administration have been leery of raising taxes, with President Obama signing into law December legislation that extended Bush-era tax breaks for two years.
Achilles said the extension "will have substantial impact on (commercial) properties you own or manage," because general partners in properties will continue to pay 15 percent tax on capital gains, instead of up to 35 percent if those gains were treated as personal income.
Tax breaks for carried interest — which serve as an incentive for general partners to invest in property maintenance — also remain in effect.
Lending issues
Many community banks that specialize in commercial lending have been forced to make write-downs that limit their ability to make new commercial mortgage loans.
That’s a problem for commercial property owners who need to refinance, Achilles said — about $1.4 trillion in commercial loans are set to mature in the next few years, and more than half of commercial properties with mortgages are underwater.
Cutbacks in small-business lending mean more businesses fail, worsening unemployment and putting downward pressure on commercial rents, placing still more pressure on community banks, he said.
Two regulatory issues could make the situation worse, Achilles said.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is considering changes to accounting rules governing how lease contracts are treated on company balance sheets.
Currently, he said, companies can treat lease payments as operating expenses. FASBE and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are proposing that companies recognize their full liability for leases on their balance sheets.
If the proposal is adopted, Achilles said, it could create problems for commercial property owners because tenants may want to renegotiate long-term leases to reduce the space they occupy and their rents.
The resulting reduction in cash flow could reduce a property’s value, and make it more difficult for owners to refinance, he said.
Another regulatory issue facing commercial property owners is bank regulators’ inconsistent treatment of loan-term extensions, he said. Loan-term extensions can help property owners who are unable to refinance weather the downturn, preventing billions in losses and stabilizing commercial property markets.
Banks "need greater flexibility to roll over performing loans" than some bank examiners are willing to give them, Achilles said.
Pending legislation that could help provide more liquidity to commercial lenders includes HR 940, which would create regulatory oversight for lenders to finance commercial loans using covered bonds.
Covered bonds, which have been used in Europe for years, won’t replace mortgage-backed securities or the secondary mortgage market, Achilles said, but could provide another avenue for channeling investment into mortgage lending.
Many lawmakers like the concept, because lenders keep loans financed by covered bonds on their books, giving them "skin in the game." Parallel legislation has been introduced in the Senate, and Achilles said the bills have a shot at passage.
Another bill that could boost commercial property markets, S 509, would raise the cap on credit union business loans from 12.25 percent of total assets to 27.5 percent. The National Credit Union Administration Board would have to certify that credit unions exceeding the current cap were well-capitalized.
Environmental issues
On the environmental front, commercial property owners should take advantage of incentives to retrofit their buildings for greater efficiency, as energy use accounts for about one-third of the operating expenses for commercial buildings.
The Obama administration has proposed an initiative aimed at achieving $40 billion a year savings through energy conservation, but IREM has yet to weigh in on the proposal, as no legislation has been introduced yet.
In general, IREM supports greater energy self-sufficiency and voluntary incentives for conservation, but opposes mandatory programs like "cap and trade" policies on emissions.
The Environmental Protection Agency has extended its lead-paint rules governing renovation, repair and painting to multifamily properties, he noted, and may propose a rule governing exteriors of commercial buildings this year.
Contact Matt Carter: Letter to the Editor
Copyright 2011 Inman NewsAll rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.








Tweet This 
