Tag Archives: Bedford Corners

Bedford Corners

A Closer Look At The Fiscal Cliff Deal’s Impact On The Built-In-Gains Recognition Period For S Corporations | Bedford Corners NY Homes

Last week, in a post titled “Secrets of the Fiscal Cliff,” I set about identifying six of the lesser publicized tax aspects of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA). In the final item, I wrote the following:

Ask a C corporation shareholder why he hasn’t converted to an S corporation, and the most common response is “the built-in-gains tax.” As a reminder, the built-in-gains tax prevents a C corporation from circumventing double taxation by converting to an S corporation and then immediately selling its assets or liquidating. In simple terms, it does so by requiring an S corporation to pay corporate level tax on any gains that were inherent in the assets of the S corporation on the date of the election and that are recognized within the first 10 years after the S election is effective.

Recent law changes, however, have provided for truncated recognition periods for existing S corporation that have reached certain landmarks in their 10-year period. For example, the 2009 Recovery Act provided that for S corporation tax years beginning in 2009 and 2010, no tax would be imposed on the net unrecognized built-in gain of an S corporation if the seventh tax year in the recognition period preceded the 2009 and 2010 tax years.

Note, however, that these law changes merely abbreviated the recognition period for certain existing S corporations that have already begun their recognition periods. For newly electing S corporations, the recognition period has always remained 10 years. Until now. The fiscal cliff deal surprisingly calls for only a 5-year recognition period for corporations that elect S status in 2012 or 2013.

I reached this conclusion based on the language of Section 326 of the ATRA, which reads:

EXTENSION OF REDUCTION IN S-CORPORATION RECOGNITION PERIOD FOR BUILT-IN GAINS TAX.

IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (7) of section 1374(d) is amended by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph:

(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR 2012 AND 2013.—For purposes of determining the net recognized built-in gain for taxable years beginning in 2012 or 2013, subparagraphs (A) and (D) shall be applied by substituting ‘5-year’ for ‘10-year’.’’

For a point of reference, pre-ATRA  Section 1374(d)(7)(A) read:

(7) Recognition period.

(A) In general. The term “recognition period” means the 10-year period beginning with the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which the corporation was an S corporation.

Putting it all together, I concluded that Section 326 of the ATRA provided a different type of relief from previous amendments to Section 1374. The fiscal cliff deal, it appeared to me, was abbreviating the typical 10-year recognition period for newly electing S corporations in 2012 and 2013 on a prospective basis. Why did I reach this conclusion, particularly in light of the fact that previous amendments to the recognition period had all been made on a retroactive basis?

For starters, the previous changes to Section 1374(d)(7) used very specific language to indicate the effect of a truncated recognition period. Consider Section 1374(d)(7)(B), which was added in 2009:

(B) Special rules for 2009, 2010, and 2011. No tax shall be imposed on the net recognized built-in gain of an S corporation—

(i) in the case of any taxable year beginning in 2009 or 2010, if the 7th taxable year in the recognition period preceded such taxable year, or

(ii) in the case of any taxable year beginning in 2011, if the 5th year in the recognition period preceded such taxable year.

Looking at it logically, I assumed that if Congress intended Section 326 of the ATRA to simply exclude from built-in-gains any gain recognized in 2012 or 2013 by an S corporation that had reached the five-year point in its recognition period, it would have written the proposed Section 1374(d)(7)(C) in the same manner as Section 1374(d)(7)(B). More to the point, Congress could have avoided adding a new subparagraph and simply amended Section 1374(d)(7)(B)(ii) by adding 2012 and 2013.

Adding a differently worded new subparagraph didn’t make sense, which is why I concluded that the language of new Section 1374(d)(7)(C) was meant to accomplish something else: to shorten the recognition period to five years for corporations electing S status in 2012 or 2013.

But over the weekend, something gave me pause, and it wasn’t just the fact that such an approach would be a departure from previous Congressional motives; it was the language of the title to Section 326 of the ATRA. As indicated above, it reads:

EXTENSION OF REDUCTION IN S-CORPORATION RECOGNITION PERIOD FOR BUILT-IN GAINS TAX.

What happens to your taxes if we go over the fiscal cliff | Bedford Corners NY Real Estate

If you’ve been paying any attention to the news, you doubtless know that the United States is rapidly approaching a “fiscal cliff.”

This is the date that various tax cuts and benefits enacted over the past 11 years are set to expire. That date is Jan.1, 2013.

It’s quite possible that President Obama and Congress will come to some agreement before Jan. 1 and extend at least some of these tax cuts.

However, it seems equally possible that they won’t.

What happens as of Jan. 1 if no deal is reached and we plunge off the cliff? Your taxes are going to go up.

The following handy chart shows what will happen if the most important of these tax provisions expire.

Expiring provisionEffect if not extended
Increase in size of 15 percent rate bracket for married couples to double that of unmarried filersThe current 15 percent rate bracket for married couples filing jointly (200 percent of the deduction for unmarried individuals) will be reduced to 167 percent of the deduction for unmarried individuals. As a result, low-income and middle-income two-earner couples will owe more to the IRS than they would if they were single making the same income.
Reduced capital gain rates for individualsCapital gains will be taxed at a 20 percent rate (increased from the current 15 percent rate).
Dividends of individuals taxed at capital gain ratesDividends received by individuals will be treated as ordinary income and taxed at top income tax rate rather than as a capital gain, currently 15 percent.
10 percent individual income tax rateThe 10 percent income tax bracket will be removed; the lowest income tax rate bracket will then be 15 percent
Tax rates in top four bracketsTax rates in the top four brackets will be increased to (from current rate): 39.6 percent (35 percent), 36 percent (33 percent), 31 percent (28 percent), 28 percent (25 percent).
Increase in standard deduction for married couplesThe standard deduction for married couples (currently 200 percent of the deduction for singles) will be reduced to 167 percent. As a result, low-income and middle-income two-earner couples will owe more to the IRS than they would if they were single making the same income.
Repeal of overall limits on itemized deductions (the “Pease Limitation”Limits on itemized deductions will be restored (currently, there is no limit on allowable deductions). The total amount of itemized deductions will be reduced by 3 percent of the amount by which a taxpayer’s adjusted gross income exceeds a certain threshold. As a result, high-income households may not be able to take some itemized deductions.
Repeal of personal exemption phaseoutUnder present law, the amount of a taxpayer’s personal exemption is not phased out. A phaseout of personal exemptions will be restored in 2013 for taxpayers above a certain threshold. As a result, high-income households may not be able use personal deductions in full.
Decreased estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer taxReverts to pre-2001 levels. The estate and gift tax exemption level will be decreased from $5 million to $1 million, while the top tax rate will increase from 35 percent to 55 percent.
Alternative Minimum Tax inflation adjustment (“AMT Patch”)An additional 28 million taxpayers will be subject to the AMT because the amount of income exempt from the AMT would revert back to $33,750 for single taxpayers and $45,000 for married couples filing jointly, down from $48,450 for single taxpayers and $74,450 for married couples filing jointly for 2012.

How much this will cost you in additional taxes for 2013? It depends on your income. The Tax Policy Center, a joint venture of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, has calculated that households in the lowest 20 percent of earners would pay an average of $412 more than in 2012, and that middle-income families would pay about $2,000 more. The top 20 percent of earners would pay an average $14,000 more, and the top 1 percent $121,000 more.

Mike Wallace’s Central Park Apt. Listed for $20M | Bedford Corners NY Real Estate

Source: theblogismine.com

Mike Wallace was far more than a newsman. One look at his Manhattan apartment reveals the original “60 Minutes” star’s place in the lofty firmament of the celebrity media.

Courtesy of an exclusive from The New York Times, Wallace’s home at 730 Park Ave, New York, NY 10021 has been put up for sale. The price is an even $20 million, which will deliver a 12-room duplex in one of the city’s most grand prewar buildings.

Wallace died earlier this year at age 93, and his wife, Mary Yates, lived at the apartment until her death in September at age 83. According to NY Times writer Robin Finn, the Wallaces opted to meticulously keep the apartment to its original standards instead of gutting the place:

Graciously appointed, No. 15-16A was carved from a 12-room apartment and retains ample architectural detail and charm: the ceilings are high, the grand staircase is curving, French doors connect the library and the master bedroom to terraces on both levels, and elaborate variegated plaster moldings and wood floors accentuate all the principal rooms except the eat-in kitchen, which is floored in vintage cork.

Unlike some other grand spaces at this address, the apartment has seen preservation take precedence over renovation. Modernization has largely been limited to the four and a half baths and the installation of air-conditioning. The monthly maintenance fee is $8,822.”

In addition to the Upper East Side apartment, Wallace was a famous part-time resident of Martha’s Vineyard. A year ago, his waterfront home at 48 Hatch Rd, Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 was sold for $7 million.

EDITORIAL: The housing market’s non recovery | Bedford Corners Real Estate

Freddie Mac issued a report Wednesday claiming the housing market may be emerging from a long slump. The government-backed mortgage giant happily cited the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo confidence index, which is up for the fifth month in a row. The home builders forecast increased home sales for the coming year, based on an expectation of higher economic growth. Unfortunately for Freddie Mac, the real data provide little reason for such optimism.

Freddie Mac also cites the related reports that jobless claims recently reached a four-year low. Nonetheless, both joblessness and the level of new claims remain at historically high levels, which is particularly troubling at this point in a recovery when the economy should be growing rapidly. More than 7.1 million Americans still claim unemployment benefits, and millions more aren’t counted because they have simply given up looking for work. Even with the four-year low, there were 359,000 new applicants for unemployment benefits in the third week of March, not much lower than the previous week’s 364,000.

Housing sales actually fell 1 percent in February. Home prices have been dropping for several months, with the Case-Shiller index declining 0.8 percent in January, the fifth consecutive month it has fallen. Home prices have tumbled 3.8 percent over the past 12 months. February might prove to be an exception, with initial estimates showing an uptick of 0.3 percent in the price of existing home sales. Such a small increase, especially when accompanied by a decline in sales in almost all the major metro areas in the nation, is not a signal of a sustainable recovery.

The fundamentals remain bleak. A lot of foreclosed homes await legal resolution. Freddie Mac is entangled in litigation, for example, with a number of local governments, about what transfer taxes it is obligated to pay on foreclosed homes. Their intrusion into the market will depress prices further still.

With the economy growing a bare 2 percent this quarter, the economy is rightly described as weak. If inventories are excluded, that rate drops to 1.1 percent. Profits also plunged this quarter, to less than half of the level of last quarter. Gasoline prices have hit record highs and continue climbing, triggering fears of inflation that follow the Federal Reserve’s ongoing easy money policy.

There is another, deeper problem with the housing market: ballooning student debt. Young people are graduating from college (or not – graduation rates for four-year colleges are shockingly low) with non-dischargeable debt that is the size of a mortgage. The grand total of student loan debt has reached about $1 trillion. It is pretty hard for young families to buy a house while loaded down with such massive obligation, even if they are lucky enough to be gainfully employed. Locking out the buyers at the entry level of the market makes recovery of the entire housing market that much harder.

Government intervention in the housing market and in the student loan market have converged to drag down the recovery. And thanks to those student loans, the young and comparatively poor won’t be able to help get the real estate market back on track.

Bedford Corners by Robert Paul | Flickr – Photo Sharing!

Bedford Corners Open House Day!! | Bedford Corners Real Estate

Bedford Corners NY Residential Real Estate  |   RobReportBlog

 

229 Byram Lake Road, Bedford Corners, NY 10549 

OPEN HOUSE TODAY 2/13/11  1:00pm to 3:00pm

229 Byram Lake Rd by Robert Paul

229 Byram Lake Rd by Robert Paul

229 Byram Pool by Robert Paul

229 Byram Pool by Robert Paul