Monthly Archives: January 2016

8 states most at risk of a housing crisis | Waccabuc Real Estate

The plummeting price of oil has some states at a much higher risk of a housing crisis, a new report from Arch MI found.

According to the private mortgage insurer’s latest Housing & Mortgage Market Review, the average likelihood of home price declines across the country over the next two years remains low, at 6%, but some states are at a much higher risk of seeing price declines.

Arch MI’s report found that the eight states in the “Energy Patch,” which are states that produce coal, oil or gas, are the most at risk of seeing a price decline in the next two years.

The state most at risk of seeing house prices decline in the next two years is North Dakota. Arch MI’s report shows that there is a 46% chance that home prices will decline in North Dakota in the next two years.

The reason? Reduction in oil and gas production already has left the state with a glut ofempty houses and apartments, and it may only get worse.

According to Arch MI’s report, North Dakota’s total employment fell 2.9% over the past year and home prices appear to be “highly overvalued.”

The authors of the Arch MI report, Ralph DeFranco, the company’s senior director of risk analytics and pricing, and Scott Fawver, the company’s econometrician, write that they expect to see continued layoffs in the energy-extraction and related sectors, such as manufacturing of drilling, mining and transportation equipment like well packers, straddle packers, including a grout packer, in other “Energy Patch” states as well.

“Most Energy Patch states will experience slower economic and home price growth and a few areas may even see outright home price declines,” DeFranco and Fawver write.

In fact, the eight states that make up the “Energy Patch” are the eight states most at risk for home price declines in the next two years,” DeFranco and Fawver write.

According to the Arch MI report, North Dakota, Wyoming, Alaska, and West Virginia are most at risk, while New Mexico, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Texas are also “worth monitoring closely.”

While North Dakota ranks as the riskiest, the other seven states at the most risk of seeing price declines are:

  • Wyoming, with a 37% chance of a price decline due to mining employment in the state, which is nation’s largest coal producer, falling to 10-year lows
  • Alaska, with a 33% chance of a price decline due to high unemployment, but the report notes that unemployment is improving in the state
  • West Virginia, with a 33% chance of a price decline due to the state seeing the second largest year-over-year drop in total employment (-1.8%) in the nation. Coal prices and employment are hurt by competition from cheap natural gas, the authors note
  • New Mexico, with a 31% chance of a price decline due to the state being at risk of a recession due to government- and energy-related job losses
  • Oklahoma, with a 28% chance of a price decline due to total employment falling in the past 3 months and home prices decelerating
  • Louisiana, with a 28% chance of a price decline due to the state being one of three states in the nation with declines in total employment (-0.5%)
  • Texas, with a 26% chance of a price decline due to employment growth remaining weak overall, but has turned positive in recent months. Texas’ home prices are also growing faster than national average

Overall, the housing market outside the “Energy Patch” is likely to improve over the next year, the report notes, despite economic headwinds from a strong dollar and expected gradual rate increases by the Federal Reserve.

read more…

The 8 states most at risk of a housing crisis

Mortgage rates average 3.92% | Bedford NY Realtor

Freddie Mac (OTCQB: FMCC) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®), showing mortgage rates moving lower with the 30-year fixed-rate declining for the second straight week.

News Facts

  • 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 3.92 percent with an average 0.6 point for the week ending January 14, 2016, down from last week when it averaged 3.97 percent. A year ago at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 3.66 percent.
  • 15-year FRM this week averaged 3.19 percent with an average 0.5 point, down from 3.26 percent last week. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 2.98 percent.

Average commitment rates should be reported along with average fees and points to reflect the total upfront cost of obtaining the mortgage. Visit the following link for theDefinitions. Borrowers may still pay closing costs which are not included in the survey.

Quote
Attributed to Sean Becketti, chief economist, Freddie Mac.

“Long-term Treasury yields continue to drop, dragging mortgage rates down with them. Turbulence in overseas financial markets is generating a flight-to-quality which benefits U.S. Treasury securities. In addition, sagging oil prices are capping inflation expectations. The net effect on the 30-year mortgage rate was a 5 basis point drop to 3.92 percent.”

Will Sellers Step up the Plate in 2016? | South Salem Real Estate

“It is important to recognize that 2016 is shaping up to be the best year in recent memory to sell. Supply remains very tight, so inventory is moving faster. Given the forecast that price appreciation will slow in 2016 to a more normal rate of growth, delaying will not produce substantially higher values, and will also see higher mortgage rates on any new purchase,” wrote Realtor.com Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke recently.

Should his sage advice to sellers fall on deaf ears, 2016 could produce one of the most miserable housing market in years.  After seven years of struggle, the issue no longer is demand, it’s supply. Anemic inventories are artificially driving up prices that keep first-time buyer trapped in rentals, which as expect to soar again this year.

Home sales prices have risen between 15 and 20 percent over the past three seasons, depending on which series you believe.  We’re less than 18 months away from reaching a national median sales price that’s higher than the very highest peak at the very top of the housing bubble in 2006.

Frozen stiff without enough equity to sell for nearly decade, owners at last have made it to the light at the end of the tunnel.  They can sell and cash out.  They can refi or take out a HELOC and stay put.  Moreover, with experts predicting that sale prices will moderate in 2016 to 4-5 percent appreciation from 6 percent as the market slow down to catch, this could be the perfect year to sell.

With the clock ticking on the opening of the 2016 season, now is the time potential sellers are making up their minds to sell or not.

Fannie Mae

In Fannie Mae’s December Home Purchase Sentiment Index, Fewer than half of respondents in Fannie Mae’s survey of consumers said it’s a good time to sell (49 percent) and 41 percent said it’s a bad time to sell.  Not exactly a strong endorsement but at least movement in the right direction.  The best thing about the findings was that in November the sentiment to sell was even lower—48 percent said it was a good time and percent and 44 percent said it was a bad time.

 

read more…

 

http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/2016/01/will-sellers-step-up-the-plate-in-2016/

QM Rule is a Yawner | Cross River Real Estate

Despite months of turmoil and repeated complaints from lenders, Realtors, builders and other members of the housing lobby, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau’s Qualified Mortgage Rule enacted in 2014 has not had any significant impact on risk taking and credit availability, according to a new study by the Federal Reserve.

Congress passed one of the most comprehensive financial reform laws in U.S. history, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. One key part of Dodd-Frank — the ability-to-repay (ATR) provision — discourages risky mortgage lending practices that proliferated during the housing boom. On January 10, 2014, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) rules implementing the ATR provision went into effect. For the first time, Federal law required lenders to consider certain underwriting criteria and make a good-faith determination that borrowers will have the ability to repay their home loans. As the new ATR requirement represented a shift toward more prescriptive regulation in the residential mortgage market, it is important to understand how the rules are affecting risk taking and credit availability.

Federal Reserve economists Neil Bhutta and Daniel RingoIn used recently released loan level data collected under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) to examine how the new rules may have affected mortgage lending activity in 2014. They examined broad lending patterns and found little indication that the new rules had a significant effect on lending in 2014. They conducted sharper tests around the date of enactment, and around lender-size and loan-pricing thresholds, where treatment of loans under the new rules varies. They found evidence that some market outcomes were affected by the new rules, but the estimated magnitudes of the responses are small.

The new ATR rules require lenders to consider and verify a number of different underwriting factors, such as a mortgage applicant’s assets or income, debt load, and credit history, and make a reasonable determination that a borrower will be able to pay back the loan. (Thus, these verification requirements prohibit so-called “no-doc” loans, where borrowers’ income and assets are not verified.) Borrowers may allege a violation of the ATR requirement within three years of the date of violation. They may also use a violation of the ATR requirement as a defense against foreclosure for the life of the loan. Lenders that are found to violate the ATR rules can be liable for monetary damages.

 

read more…

 

http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/2016/01/qm-rule-is-a-yawner/

Mortgage Rates in 2016: Nothing to get Excited About | Katonah Real Estate

Bankrate’s senior financial analyst Greg McBride isn’t sweating the new environment in mortgage rates.  December’s FOMC decision to start the upward climb one baby step at a time won’t really mean much to home sales in the larger scheme of things and most homeowners who wanted to refinance have already done so.

McBride sees rates on a 30-year fixed ending the year at 4 to 4½ percent or so—not much higher than the current 3.89 percent but higher than in past years.

More importantly, rates will not rise enough to deter sales.  “Rather, buyers and sellers will make their decisions based on conditions in their personal lives, such as downsizing with the kids move out,” McBride said in an interview with Real Estate Economy Watch

As for refinancing, there has been a lot of opportunity in recent years and demand is exhausted, he said.  And don’t look for a revival of demand for adjustable rate mortgages. “Consumers are still squeamish following the subprime crash, he said.  The mortgage market in 2016 will be fixed rate and heavily weighted towards purchase over refi loans.

 

read more…

 

http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/2016/01/mortgage-rates-in-2016-nothing-to-get-excited-about/

No Relief in Sight on Rents | Bedford Hills Real Estate

The long anticipated slowdown in rent increases from record numbers of new multi-family projects opening for business has yet to materialize as rental demand drove rents to record levels in the first three quarters of 2015, sending the national apartment market soaring to its strongest year in a decade.

According to data from Axiometrics, a specialist in apartment market research and analysis:

  • Annual effective rent growth of 4.7% in the fourth quarter of 2015 represented a 7-basis-point (bps) increase from the figure of one year earlier (also rounded to 4.7%), though it was 35 bps lower than the 5.2% of the third quarter of 2015. The fourth-quarter rate is the highest year-end figure since 2005, when effective rent growth was 5.8%.
  • Rent growth has been 4.7% or above for five straight quarters, even though a three-quarter streak of at least 5.0% growth was broken. Never in Axiometrics’ 20-year history has annual effective rent growth been at 4.7% or above for such a long period.
  • Quarter-over-quarter effective rent growth was -0.6% in the fourth-quarter, continuing a trend of negative rent growth at the end of the year. That rate was a 32-bps decrease from the 0.3% reported in 4Q14 and marked the only quarter of 2015 in which the rent-growth rate decreased from the corresponding quarter of 2014. It should be noted that quarter-to-quarter rent growth is normally negative in the fourth quarter due to seasonality.
  • Average national rent was $1,244 for the fourth quarter of 2015, a $54 increase from the average of $1,188 in the fourth quarter of 2014.
QUARTERLY EFFECTIVE RENT GROWTH
Quarter2012201320142015
First0.6%0.4%0.5%0.9%
Second2.2%2.1%2.7%2.7%
Third1.3%1.2%1.7%2.0%
Fourth-0.6%-0.9%-0.3%-0.6%
 Source: Axiometrics Inc.

 

“Quarters 1-3 were the most robust period we have seen since before the Great Recession,” said Jay Denton, Axiometrics’ Senior Vice President of Analytics. “Much of the fourth-quarter moderation can be attributed to several Western markets that experienced double-digit rent growth for most of the year but could not sustain that pace.”

 

read more…

 

http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/2016/01/no-relief-in-sight-on-rents/

“Know Before You Owe” Blamed for Sudden Sales Slump | Bedford Real Estate

Existing-home sales dropped off considerably in November to the slowest pace in 19 months, but the National Association of Realtors said some of the decrease was likely due to the “Know before you owe” or the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures rule (TRID), which took effect October 3. The rule requires lenders and service providers to provide binding estimates and final accounting of closing costs before closings take place.

Total existing-home sales fell 10.5 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.76 million in November (lowest since April 2014 at 4.75 million) from a downwardly revised 5.32 million in October. After last month’s decline (largest since July 2010 at 22.5 percent), sales are now 3.8 percent below a year ago – the first year-over-year decrease since September 2014. Four major regions saw large sales declines in November.

November also marked the second straight month home sales have fallen on a monthly basis.  In October, home sales fell 3.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.36 million in October from 5.55 million in September but were still 3.9 percent above October 2014.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said “Sparse inventory and affordability issues continue to impede a large pool of buyers’ ability to buy, which is holding back sales,” he said. “However, signed contracts have remained mostly steady in recent months, and properties sold faster in November. Therefore, it’s highly possible the stark sales decline wasn’t because of sudden, withering demand.”  Yun said the longer timeframes anticipated by the new rule pushed some closings into December.

However, most reports of TRID implementation show the new rule is having minimal impact.

According to a survey by Campbell Surveys found that the total average closing time including delays for most loan types stayed relatively level or showed only a slight increase between September and October.

“While there was apprehension about TRID, so far impacts are minor,” said Tom Popik, research director of Campbell Surveys.  Popik noted that measuring the effects of TRID is still in the early stages as many more TRID-compliant transactions are scheduled to close this month.

 

read more…

 

http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/2015/12/know-before-you-owe-blamed-for-sudden-sales-slump/

Recovery Will Slow in 2016 as Fewer Homes Gain Value | Pound Ridge Real Estate

The number of homes nationwide gaining value on a monthly basis are expected to fall by 12 percent over the next 10 months as the housing recovery slows. Just over half, 51.3 percent, of America’s homes will continue to appreciate by October 2016, according to forecasts by Weiss Analytics.

The percentage of homes losing value nationwide are expected to decline, but fewer than the decline in appreciating homes.   Some 23.2 percent of homes are expected to depreciate on a monthly basis, a 6.4 percent drop from October 2015.

The forecasted decline in appreciating homes will continue a multi-year decline.  Since July 2014, the percentage of appreciating homes has fallen from 65.2 percent to 58.4 percent in October 2014 despite a 4.5 percent uptick in August.  The Weiss forecast predicts a 21 percent. decline over a 27-month period in the number of homes nationwide that are gaining value on a monthly basis.

Among the metros forecasted to be among the top ten appreciating markets in the nation by October 2016 are several that suffered some of the greatest losses in median home prices when the housing bubble burst in 2007.  These include Reno NV, forecast to have 98.3 percent of its homes appreciating on a monthly basis; Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL, forecast to have 93 percent of homes appreciating; Stockton-Lodi, forecast to have 89.1 percent of homes appreciating; Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ, to have 84.4 percent of homes appreciating and Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC, to have 83.3 percent of homes appreciating.

Metros that will have the lowest appreciation rates in October 2014 are all from the South and Midwest. Raleigh, NN will have the lowest appreciation rate of 1.2%.  Only 3,757 of the 306,901 Raleigh homes in the Weiss database will be gaining value on a monthly basis.

“During the past three years the recovery has generated year over year double digit annual price increases.[1] Our data and analytics show that the pace of change in home values is slowing down—both among homes that are losing value as well as those that have been appreciating.  This retrenchment may delay the return to price parity in some markets but it in others it will help to prevent the formation of bubbles of overvalued properties that could result in defaults,” said Allan Weiss, CEO and founder of Weiss Analytics and former CEO and co-founder of Case Shiller Weiss.

 

read more…

 

http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/2015/12/recovery-will-slow-in-2016-as-fewer-homes-gain-value/

Why the Housing Boom is Good for Minority Homeownership | Bedford Corners Real Estate

Fourteen years ago, improving minority homeownership was front burner issue.  In 2002, the Bush Administration even set a goal of expanding the number of minorities who owned their own homes by 5.5 million—approximately the number of existing homes sold in a very good year.

The subprime crash and housing depression put a sudden end to that effort.  Minority homeownership plummeted and, surprisingly, never achieved the attention from top policy makers in two Obama administrations that it enjoyed under their predecessor.

For homeownership in general, the housing depression was depressing.  For minorities, it was a disaster.  For African-American households, the homeownership rate peaked at 49.4 percent in 2004 and bottomed out at 41.9 in the first quarter of this year, a decline of 7.5 points.  Hispanic American homeownership reached a high of 49.8 percent in 2006 and fell to 44.1 percent in the first quarter of this year, down 5.7 points.  By comparison, white non-Hispanic homeownership peaked at 76 percent in 2004 and fell to 73.4 percent by 2013 when the housing recovery officially began, a decline of only 2.6 points.

Do Higher Prices Help Minorities?

Conventional wisdom maintains that rising prices are bad for minorities because they are priced out of affordable housing, especially in gentrifying urban neighborhoods where today young Millennial whites are driving prices sky high.  However, a new study by two economists at the Federal Trade Commission published in the Journal of Housing Economics this month suggest the exact opposite is the case.  Higher prices mean better times for minorities.

Rising prices are good for minorities, the economists argue, because they are accompanied by a loosening of lending standards.  Rising values alter lenders; judgments about acceptable levels of risk and expected rates of return on housing-related assets.  “This variation may then translate into changes in the out-comes experienced by minority borrowers relative to non-minorities,’ they concluded

read more…

 

http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/2015/12/why-the-housing-boom-is-good-for-minority-homeownership/

Rates average 3.97% | Chappaqua Real Estate

Freddie Mac (OTCQB: FMCC) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®), showing mortgage rates mixed with the 30-year fixed-rate falling back below four percent to start the year.

News Facts

  • 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 3.97 percent with an average 0.6 point for the week ending January 7, 2016, down from last week when it averaged 4.01 percent. A year ago at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 3.73 percent.
  • 15-year FRM this week averaged 3.26 percent with an average 0.5 point, up from 3.24 percent last week. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 3.05 percent.
  • 5-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) averaged 3.09 percent this week with an average 0.5 point, up from last week when it averaged 3.08 percent. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 2.98 percent.

Average commitment rates should be reported along with average fees and points to reflect the total upfront cost of obtaining the mortgage. Visit the following link for theDefinitions. Borrowers may still pay closing costs which are not included in the survey.

Quote
Attributed to Sean Becketti, chief economist, Freddie Mac.

“Concerns about overseas economic developments have dominated financial markets to start the year. U.S. Treasury bond yields fell amidst a global equity selloff and flight to safety. In response, the 30-year mortgage rate dipped 4 basis points to 3.97 percent.”