A lot of these apartments, in Phoenix Island, Hainan province, are probably empty. (Wang Zhao/AFP/Getty Images)

The real estate market in Phoenix Island, a development project in the Chinese island province of Hainan, was so inflated, so outrageously expensive and unsustainable, that it became known as the Dubai of China. With its palm tree-lined streets, glimmering high-rises and ostentatious sports cars, it even looked a little like Dubai. And now, also like Dubai but maybe more in the vein of south Florida, the Phoenix Island real estate market that drove so much local economic growth has imploded.

Phoenix Island is an extreme case, but it’s in many ways symptomatic of China’s skyrocketing real estate market, which is both a blessing and a curse for China. A blessing because it helps to drive economic growth and domestic consumption, which the country’s economy needs more of to be healthy. It’s a curse because, as Americans are well aware, it can burst, pulling down much of the national economy with it.

If the national real estate market collapses in China, it would be disastrous not just for China but for the entire world economy, risking a third wave of the global crisis that began with the U.S. financial collapse and worsened with the Euro crisis. Is Phoenix Island an outlier, a crazy market so extreme that it tells us little about China? Is it the start of a major but recoverable setback? Or, in the worst-case scenario, is it the beginning of the end for China’s astounding 20 years of miraculous economic growth?

In some ways (but not all), China is even more exposed to the dangers of a real estate collapse than America was. Washington Post business reporter Jia Lynn Yang pointed out last fall that urban housing stock constituted 41 percent of Chinese household wealth of 2011. The number was 26 percent in the U.S. In other words, Chinese families tend to invest almost twice as much of their money in urban real estate than do American families. So, if you thought Americans were hit hard when that real estate suddenly lost value, it could be even worse for Chinese, who also tend to put much more of their earnings into long-term investments than do Americans. That said, it would also take a bigger drop in prices for the market to collapse, as Chinese buyers tend to put down larger down payments.

And here’s the really scary number: 13 percent of Chinese GDP in 2011 came from real estate investment. 13 percent! If that investment stalls abruptly, as it did in Phoenix Island, the rest of the Chinese economy could follow. That could cause political instability in China and, much more certainly, would set back the global economy.

The problem is that the Chinese tend to put their money in real estate because they perceive it as a safe and reliable investment. This drives up prices, which leads more Chinese to invest, which drives up prices more. But because people are treating housing as an investment, the market is artificially inflated. People buy apartments but don’t live in them. One day, it’s possible that Chinese consumers will wake up and decide that those investment apartments aren’t such safe investments after all, or maybe they’ll just need to free up the cash they used to buy them, at which point they’ll want to start selling. That will lead prices to drop, perhaps catastrophically. If you’re a standard Chinese family with 41 percent of your money tied up in real estate and that real estate loses more than half of its value, as it did in Phoenix City, then it’s like a whole bunch of your money just disappeared.

I asked Patrick Chovanec, whose economics teaching at China’s prestigious Tsinghua University has made him a respected and much-cited source on China’s economy, how we would know if the Chinese real estate bubble was bursting. In other words, when do we start panicking?

“As long as the money supply keeps expanding aggressively (15%+ per year), and people (absent alternatives) are willing to plow that money into real estate and hold it, this [real estate market] can persist for some time,” Chovanec explains in an e-mail. “But when the flow of new money slows — either because of the need to rein in inflation, including housing inflation, or the need to roll over and refinance bad debt (often at rising rates of interest) — the whole thing begins to unravel.”

Is Phoenix Island, in Florida-like Hainan province, the beginning of the end? Chovanec writes, “Some of the quotes (besides mine) in the article suggest this could be happening in Hainan — we’ll have to wait and find out if that is what’s happening, and whether it signifies a broader deleveraging that would have implications beyond Hainan.”

How, I asked Chovanec, would the market actually collapse, if it does? It turns out that, because China’s economy is so “opaque” – much of the action happens informally, which makes it really hard to watch for indicators – the market basically collapses when Chinese consumers believe it is collapsing. Here’s Chovanec, with my emphasis added:

It’s very very hard to tell. First of all, because so much financing has gone outside the banking system, the standard measures of money supply (M1, M2) don’t tell us very much any more about the amount of “money” (i.e., credit) in the Chinese economy. Most of the credit expansion we’re seeing is off balance sheet. In fact, a lot of credit growth that we’re seeing is inter-company or buyer credit — companies pretending they have sales when in fact they may or may not ever get paid.

Second, it’s hard to tell how much of that credit expansion is being “eaten up” by the need to roll over bad debt at interest, rather than financing new investment. That’s where the real crunch comes, and why we’re seeing, consistently, the returns (in terms of GDP growth) to credit expansion decline. In other words, it takes more and more credit expansion to deliver less and less economic growth — less bang for the buck.

So it’s an opaque process that depends, in large part, on the willingness of everyone to believe that they will, somehow, get paid in the end. If that ever comes into doubt, credit suddenly disappears and everyone rushes to cash out, and there isn’t enough cash to meet all claims. I don’t know if and when that will happen, but even if it never happens, the dependence on credit expansion to roll over more and more bad debt inevitably puts a squeeze on growth.

As long as Chinese consumers wake up every morning feeling basically okay about having 41 percent of their money invested in real estate, we’re probably okay. But if they start to change their minds, whether for political or economic reasons or out of sheer panic, the Chinese economy is not ready to cash them out. It would be like a run on the bank, except that the bank is an overinflated real estate market that’s worth 13 percent of the 2011 GDP of the world’s second-largest economy.

A real estate collapse in little Phoenix Island or in less-little Hainan is probably not the starter pistol for that bank run, unless Chinese consumers decide it is, in which case it is.

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. homebuilders began work at a slower pace in January than in December. But all of the drop occurred in the volatile area of apartment construction, which sank 24 percent. By contrast, the rate of single-family homebuilding rose 0.8 percent.

Even with the overall decline, the pace of home construction in January was the third-highest since 2008 and was evidence of continued strengthening in residential real estate.

And in an encouraging sign for the rest of the year, applications for building permits, a signal of future construction, topped December’s rate. Applications for permits are at their highest point since mid-2008.

VIDEO:

US Stocks Dip Ahead of January Jobs Data

The Commerce Department said Wednesday that builders started work at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 890,000 homes last month. That was down 8.5 percent from December, when housing starts had hit an annual rate of 973,000, the most since June 2008.

Analysts had expected a decline on January construction, given the sharp gain in December. December had initially been reported at an annual rate of 920,000. On Wednesday, the department revised up the December pace to 973,000.

January’s was only the second drop in construction in the past six months. It still left the annual pace of homebuilding 23.6 percent higher than a year ago.

VIDEO:

President Obama Starts Second Term with New Goals

Economists noted that building permits keep increasing. Dan Greenhaus, chief global strategist for BTIG, said the increase in permits suggested that the January decline in construction starts would be temporary and that “as the year progresses, housing starts will continue to push higher.”

Greenhaus said he wouldn’t be surprised if construction starts topped 1 million for 2013.

The U.S. housing market is slowly regaining its health after stagnating for roughly five years after the housing boom collapsed. Steady job gains and near-record-low mortgage rates have encouraged more people to buy.

STORY:

The Bakken Shale Oil Boom Floods Rural Banks With Cash

A steady rise in prices reflects, in part, fewer homes for sale. The supply of previously occupied homes for sale has reached its lowest level in more than a decade. And the pace of foreclosures, while still rising in some states, has slowed sharply on a national basis. That means fewer low-priced foreclosed homes are being dumped on the market.

Those trends, and the likelihood of further price gains, have led builders to step up construction. Last year, builders broke ground on the most homes in four years.

For all of 2012, builders started work on 780,000 homes. That was still only about half the annual number consistent with healthy markets. But it represents a 28 percent jump from 2011. And it was the most housing starts since 2008, when construction was still falling after the housing bubble burst more than six years ago.

VIDEO:

Hartman: Signs of Improving Labor Conditions

Sales of new homes jumped nearly 20 percent last year to 367,000, the most since 2009. Still, many economists don’t foresee a full housing recovery before 2015 at the earliest.

The National Association of Home Builders said Tuesday that confidence among U.S. homebuilders slipped in February from a 6 1/2-year high in January. Many builders reported less traffic by prospective customers before the critical spring home-buying season begins.

The home builders’ sentiment index dipped to 46 in February from 47 in January. It was the first monthly decline in the index since last April.

STORY:

The Market’s Doing Just Fine Without Apple

Readings below 50 suggest negative sentiment about the housing market. The last time the index was at 50 or higher was in April 2006, when it was 51. It began trending higher in October 2011, when it was 17.

Many builders are facing higher costs for building materials and having trouble obtaining financing for construction. Some also are facing a shortage of workers in markets where residential construction has picked up sharply, such as Texas and Arizona.

Though new homes represent only a fraction of the housing market, they have an outsize impact on the economy. Each home built creates an average of three jobs for a year and generates about $90,000 in tax revenue, according to statistics from the home builders.

By region, January’s decline in home construction was led by a 50 percent drop in the Midwest and a 35.3 percent decline in the Northeast. Analysts saw both declines as likely weather related. Construction rose 16.7 percent in the West and 4.1 percent in the South.