We believe in content marketing and we’ve seen the results, both working on behalf of our clients and also for our own company (that oh so appetizing phrase of “eating your own dog food”). It’s one of the reasons we launched our Content Magnet service, to even more effectively present and help people understand the different aspects of content marketing. And yet, even though the word “marketing” is in the phrase “content marketing,” we’ve consistently found that forgetting about the marketing part is the biggest content marketing mistake companies make.
Typically we see things go wrong when organizations fall prey to one of these major content marketing myths:
Myth 1: Writing is easy.
Everyone thinks they can write. Yet anyone who has lived through enough website projects knows that content development frequently causes huge delays. Folks wouldn’t dream of thinking they could design their own website just because they downloaded Photoshop. Yet, for some reason, since everyone has Microsoft Word, writing is perceived as easy.
What’s missing in this approach is proper planning. Content marketing is no different from other marketing channels – to be successful you need to have a strategic and tactical plan centered around unified goals and objectives. Without that, even if you think the writing part is easy, it’s likely not going to be effective.
Myth 2: Once the writing part is done, I just post it and readers start rolling in.
Companies assume that (channeling my Field of Dreams voice) “If you write it they will come.” In reality, quality content does not magically find its way into the hands of its target audience like the ballplayers from the film magically coming out of the cornfield. That’s why organizations that invest in content creation (which, as we discussed above “should be pretty easy”) get blindsided when their content marketing effort doesn’t impact traffic, lead generation or customer acquisition. They built the field, but nobody came to play.
Any content marketing effort needs to incorporate both an optimization strategy and a distribution strategy. It’s not enough to write it, post it, and forget about it. The key is to have a cohesive optimization and distribution plan to target a qualified audience and increase each piece of content’s reach. This is a large factor in the “marketing” part most people ignore when it comes to content marketing.
Myth 3: Let’s just keep writing and something will happen,
This follows the first 2 points – without a plan, and without optimization and distribution, it’s hard to have a solid understanding of what’s working, what’s falling flat, and how to adjust. Most organizations, even if they do some data reporting, miss the critical marketing function of analysis – the difference being what the numbers are (data) and what the numbers mean (analysis).
Myth 4: This content marketing thing sounds hard – let’s just do something with social media
10 tweets and 3 Facebook posts a week do not a content marketing strategy make. Mike outlined this in his post Don’t Let the Social Media Tail Wag the Content Marketing Dog. As Mike writes:
“While content marketing efforts are absolutely enhanced via social media marketing, content marketing can happen without social media marketing. On the flip side, social media marketing loses a whole lot of punch without content marketing. Without content, social media marketing stops after 140 characters and only continues when you’re ready to answer the question “What’s happening?” again, or listen to someone else’s response to that question.”
Social media marketing is not only an enhancement of a content marketing strategy but, when done well, is a form of content marketing.
Keep these myths in mind and make sure you don’t make the biggest content marketing mistake – forgetting about the marketing.
Tag Archives: Armonk Luxury Homes
5 Tornado Ingredients that’ll Ensure Your Next Post Turns Viral | Armonk NY Homes
Mobile Search for the Armonk NY Realtor | Armonk Luxury Properties
Email A/B Split Test Experiment | Email Marketing Strategy | Armonk NY Homes
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
– Albert Einstein (1879-1955)If you’ve been following my Marketing Over Coffee (MoC) blog series, you know that we’ve been running a little experiment here at the Factory. My first blog post introduced the experiment, which involved testing two MoC email templates against each other. The first template was very text-heavy and light on design. The second, which Blue Sky Factory designed, involved more HTML design, followed industry best practices, and was more polished and professional looking.
My second blog post revealed these two creatives and compared them against each other. I explained how, by all email best practices, the second template was “better” than the first. I then went on to outline how the A/B split test would work.
![]()
Previously Used Template
![]()
New Template
Let The Testing Begin!
The A/B split test was launched on September 22nd to 40% of the MoC email list. 20% of their list received the old template, while the other 20% received the new template. Subject line, From Name, email content and date/time of send were all completely identical so that the only factor we were testing was the actual template design. We allowed the A/B test to run for a sufficient amount of time, then gathered the email metrics to determine the winning email that would be sent to the remaining 60% of the list.
After letting the A/B test run for two hours, the new template had a slight edge on the old template. The old template had received an open rate of 9.8% and a click-through rate of 0.9%. The new template, however, had received an open rate of 11.6% and a click-through rate of 2.3%. Satisfied with these results, we sent the “winning” new template to the remainder of the list.
We continued to follow the results of the A/B test into the next day, and then something interesting happened…
It Turned Into A TIE!
Seriously, the results were almost identical. The old template finished strong with a 25.7% open rate and a 4.2% click-through rate, whereas the new template received a 27.0% open rate and a 4.7% click-through rate. The new template’s results were still slightly higher, but it certainly did not blow the old template out of the water. In addition, the MoC team tracked downloads of an OPML file on their site. MoC found that unique clicks from each email to the OPML file were almost identical from the two templates, while there were more repeat clicks to the file from the old template than the new template.
What We Learned
What a colossal waste of time, you may be thinking. Not so! What we learned from this experiment was that industry best practices do not necessarily work for all audiences. To learn what works for your email recipients, you must Test, Test, Test! Not all audiences will respond to the same type of subject line, call-to-action, email design, landing page, etc. Test different types with your own email recipients, and use what works best for your email campaigns.
So What Now?!?
With these inconclusive results in mind, what does Marketing Over Coffee plan to do moving forward? After speaking with Chris Penn, one of the co-hosts of MoC, about the A/B test results, they plan on using a “hybrid” email template for future campaigns. They will use the design and look of the new template, and apply that to the “barebones simplicity” of the old template. This will help MoC to maintain the polished, professional look of the new template, while keeping the email template easy to use for the MoC team.
Intrigued by this experiment and want to conduct your own? Click here to read how to get started with your own A/B test. Ready to run a creative A/B test of your own? Check out our creative portfolio to see what our team can do, and contact us if you’re ready to start experimenting!
Joanna Lawson-Matthew
Account Manager, Blue Sky Factory
Armonk NY Weekend Real Estate Report | RobReportBlog | Armonk NY Homes
Armonk NY Real Estate | RobReportBlog

63 homes available
$1,450,000 median price
$14,995,000 high price
$469,000 low price
$412 average price per foot
205 average DOM
5009 average size
More Homeowners Under Water With Their Mortgages | Armonk NY Homes – Robert Paul’s blog
Sometime, somehow, the foreclosure crisis will ease. But probably not anytime soon.
Home prices dropped 2.6% nationwide during the last three months of 2010, pushing more borrowers underwater, according to a quarterly real estate market survey from Zillow.com.
Now 27% of homeowners with mortgages owe more than their homes are worth. That’s up from 23.2% a quarter earlier.That will surely lead to higher foreclosure rates soon. That’s because being underwater is second only to unaffordable payments in leading to foreclosure, according to Zillow’s chief economist, Stan Humphries.
Additionally, the report found that more than one-third of all homes were sold at a loss in December. That trend has been on a steady uptick for the past six months, as homeowners try to find ways around foreclosure or out from under their homes.
The so-called “robo-signing” events of the fall also forced the number of underwater mortgages higher.
When banks’ foreclosure paperwork came under scrutiny, many halted all repossessions until they could straighten things out. With foreclosures no longer being cleaned out of the system, more homes stayed underwater rather than moving on to foreclosure.
Full Story
Armonk NY Homes
Armonk Luxury Homes
Armonk NY Windmill by Robert Paul | Flickr – Photo Sharing!

TheRobReportBlog | Armonk NY Weekly Real Estate Report
AemonkArmonk NY Real Estate Report | RobReportBlog
63 homes available
$14,995,000 high price
$469,000 low price
$1,350,000 median price
4921 average square feet
$418 average price per foot
209 average days on market
New York State Association of REALTORS, Inc. – New York housing market aided by tax credit, low mortgage rates in 2010 | Armonk NY Homes

“Without the federal homebuyer tax credit, we would undoubtedly be telling a much different story about the Empire State’s 2010 housing market,” said Duncan R. MacKenzie, NYSAR chief executive officer. “The tax credit, low mortgage rates and large inventory combined to help New York State homebuyers overcome larger concerns about the economy.”
With little chance of another significant federal home buying incentive, the future of housing in our state may well be dictated by how state lawmakers address the enormous state budget deficit…
Scarlett Johansson Loses $3 Million On LA Home Sale | Armonk NY Real Estate

Many American homeowners lost their shirts, their shorts and even their homes when the U.S. economy fell off the wall like Humpty Dumpty. Two years later the government still struggles to put it all back together again while regular hardworking Americans and stars of all stripes continue to be pummeled by the steep devaluation of their real estate investments, many of which were purchased at the peak of the recent real estate bubble.
Even though they priced them far below what they paid, there were oodles of celebs who failed to sell their homes in 2010 and many who lost substantial amounts of money, even when they did manage to offload their properties. And still other famous folks, like Latoya Jackson, Timothy Busfield and hip-hop entrepreneur Damon Dash, found themselves forced into foreclosure on luxurious and expensive residences they could no longer afford.
One of the biggest losers in the 2010 celebrity real estate game was idiosyncratic and stunningly beautiful actress Scarlett Johansson who plunked down a very A-list $7 million to buy a huge house in May of 2007 in the star studded Outpost Estates section of Los Angeles. (This was before she wed Ryan Reynolds; she and Reynolds made headlines this week when they announced their marriage was over after just two years.) Her neighbors included Oscar nominated desperate housewife Felicity Huffman and Oscar winner Charlize Theron. Property records show Johansson caught a very serious and costly case of the real estate fickle and sold the 1930s Spanish hillside villa at a pocketbook punishing $3 million loss in June of 2010.


According to research from
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
AemonkArmonk NY Real Estate Report | RobReportBlog