Category Archives: Pound Ridge

A conversation with tech guru Walt Mossberg | Inman News In Pound Ridge NY

 Walt MossbergWalt Mossberg

I recently had an opportunity to chat with Walt Mossberg about the ninth annual All Things Digital conference and get his insights on mobile, social media and the next big thing.

Mossberg is the author and creator of the weekly Personal Technology column in The Wall Street Journal, which has appeared every Thursday since 1991.

In addition to Personal Technology, Mossberg also writes the Mossberg’s Mailbox column in the Journal, and edits The Digital Solution column, which is authored by his colleague, Katherine Boehret.

He appears regularly on television and Internet video as a commentator on technology issues. He is a weekly contributor to the Fox Business Network and has been interviewed repeatedly on programs like “Charlie Rose” and “PBS NewsHour,” as well as on National Public Radio.

The following is my Q-and-A with Mossberg.

Q: The initial lineup for the upcoming All Things Digital conference includes Andrew Mason, CEO of Groupon. A Chicago-based real estate firm recently offered a deal through Groupon, which was a first in our industry. Can you talk about Groupon and its effect on consumer shopping?

A: Groupon and its competitors have done two important things: made coupons digital, and therefore easy and instant in a tight economy; and made them social by requiring a minimum number of people to participate and encouraging people to get their friends to participate.

Q: Apple finally addressed concerns over the iPhone collecting and storing location data. Apple, Google, Microsoft and RIM seem to approach privacy differently. How concerned should we be?

A: I believe that, at least for now, Apple isn’t violating the privacy of individual iPhone users. But, overall, the privacy dangers involved in location-based apps and in Web advertising and app advertising in general are considerable.

I believe that either the industry or the government must require all involved companies to not only disclose when information is being collected, but ask the user’s permission.

Q: At the D8 conference, you put Mark Zuckerburg on the “hot seat” and addressed privacy concerns with Facebook and social media. Has Facebook matured in the last year? What do you think the future holds for Facebook?

A: Facebook has improved its privacy controls, but it still is too easy for users’ information to wind up exposed to outside people and entities without their even knowing it. Users must be especially careful when using third-party apps on the Facebook platform, since they can be granted access to lots of information.

Q: There has been a huge explosion in mobile, which has certainly impacted the real estate industry. The iPad has been wildly popular. How have other tablets matched up, in your opinion? For example, the BlackBerry Playbook, the Xoom, Samsung Galaxy, etc.

A: Not yet. In my tests so far, no other tablet has measured up to the iPad 2 in terms of key factors like battery life and the variety and quality of tablet-optimized apps. Also, no other tablet has achieved significant market share. But the competition is just getting started.

Q: Last December you hosted “Dive into Mobile” in San Francisco and there will be an “AsiaD” in Hong Kong this October. These are new conferences, can you talk about these events and some of the new things you’re working on?

A: For nine years, we’ve had great success with the annual D: All Things Digital conference each spring in California. And we have an influential website … that runs year-round. So, now we are expanding.

We have more than doubled the writing staff of the website and are adding new versions of the conference. The Asian edition is especially important, because Asia is a tech hotbed, and we are planning to bring over a number of important U.S. tech figures, plus tech leaders from all over Asia.

Q: Social media, mobile and apps have changed the technology landscape. What do you see as the “next big thing”?

A: We are in the “post-PC” era, where a wide variety of devices will have access to apps and data stored on servers in the “cloud.” Apps for smartphones, tablets, e-readers and other devices, plus Web apps that run inside browsers, could gradually replace traditional programs running on laptops.

And laptops themselves will become redefined. Apple is incorporating iPad-like features into its next computer operating system, and Google is bringing out “Chromebooks” — laptops that run an operating system that’s essentially nothing but a browser that runs apps from the Web.

 

 

 

Cool tech to drive real estate biz | Inman News in Pound Ridge NY

 

Flickr image courtesy of <a href= 

 One of the great things about owning an iPhone, iPad, or an Android-based mobile device is all the fun applications that improve the quality of both your life and your business.

At our recent Awesome Females in Real Estate conference, Cary Sylvester, the executive director of technology for Keller Williams, spoke at a great session, entitled, “There’s an App for That: Technology Tools to Drive Your Business.” The cost of most of those apps she discussed ranges from free to $1.99.

The first category Sylvester discussed was communication. (Please note that these apps are available for both Apple and Android operating systems, unless noted.)

1. Google Voice
Most agents have multiple phone numbers on their cards and their marketing materials. The challenge is that clients have neither the time nor the inclination to track the agent down. Google Voice creates a single, personalized phone number that rings on all of your phones at the same time.

Facebook Ideas from Leading Retailers | Pound Ridge NY Homes

As U.S. consumers continue to spend increasing amounts of time on Facebook, and as brands amass larger followings than major women’s magazines, fashion retailers are investing greater resources into the world’s largest social network.

But how can retailers optimize their Facebook presence? Should they focus on entertainment and product, or is it best utilized as a customer service channel? How far should they engage? Is it too early to think of Facebook as a sales tool?

We’ve taken these questions to some of the best and brightest minds in the business and gathered their thoughts for you below.


1. Focus on Engagement, Not Sales


 

 

 

Although some retailers, such as Express and ASOS, are opening up stores on Facebook, the time is not yet ripe for F-commerce, most fashion retailers agree.

While iframes is certainly making ecommerce integration on Facebook easier and more cost-effective, Facebook is still best employed as a customer relationship management (CRM) tool, says Maureen Mullen, chief researcher at luxury think tank L2.

“In the same way that portals MSN and Yahoo and then search became the most powerful shopping engines in the world, social media will be the next big wave,” Mullen believes. “But we’re not there yet. Right now [retailers] need to focus on engagement and content strategy,” she advises.


2. Develop a Product-Centric Content Strategy


 

 

 

Mullen recommends retailers provide information and access to products beyond what fans would find on their ecommerce sites or in their stores. She suggests retailers develop visually attractive, entertaining content that enables fans to learn more about the design and development of a product, the designer who created it and others behind-the-scenes snapshots.

“Fans really want to hear more about product and want to interact with the brand itself,” Mullen says. “Provide users with content they never would have had access to without the advent of social media, share different perspectives and allow fans to share what they think in real-time,” she adds.

Ralph Lauren-owned retailer Club Monaco’s Facebook Page is designed to give fans an inside look at the company’s brand and culture while simultaneously becoming a part of it — what Ann Watson, Club Monaco’s VP of marketing and communications, calls the “inside out” approach.

“Our goal is to use Facebook as a portal to share additional content that’s not available anywhere else,” she says, noting that Facebook is the place where news, content and lookbooks (often modeled by Club Monaco employees) are shared first. Club Monaco also offers exclusive giveaways, such as concert tickets and original art.

Facebook, Watson believes, isn’t just a channel for sales, branding, entertainment or engagement — it’s a place for all of these things. “The messaging is what differentiates it. We drive sales by humanizing the message around it — literally!” she explains. “We promote our product in a way that we hope fans feel is authentic, because we display it via real people on our team and the real way they wear our collections, offering genuine styling tips,” she says.

 

 

 

We also admire the Facebook Page of New York-based luxury retailer Bergdorf Goodman, which creates a range of content around a certain theme or trend based on what’s happening at its store, a spokesperson tells us. Last week’s theme centered around its Jean Sequence event, which is extended across content and imagery on the retailer’s Facebook Page, blog, website, Polyvore tab and more.

“Like the store itself, we want our page to be a destination where people enjoy spending their time and looking around,” the spokesperson says. “It’s about providing interesting and compelling information as a fashion leader… [and] having a conversation with people; sales is just a by-product,” she adds.

“The primary focus for us is engaging and entertaining our fans — if in turn this results in sales, this is a bonus.”


3. Allow for Two-Way Dialogue


 

 

 

Whilst many of the above brands have done commendable jobs developing content around product, several have just as commendably opened up opportunities for engagement — something, L2′s Mullen says, most fashion brands are too afraid to do.

Fashion and especially luxury brands are “very protective of their brands and images, traditionally maintaining an armed distance from their consumers and creating a sense of scarcity around their product,” says Mullen. Yet many brands aren’t allowing their Facebook Pages to be truly social; “users are being allowed to opt into a relationship with [brands], but [brands] are telling them they don’t really care what they have to say,” says Mullen.

Brands and retailers need to open up opportunities for two-way discussion as much as possible, Mullen insists. She encourages marketers to employ polls, respond to fans’ comments and develop content based on their feedback.

These tools are well-utilized by brands and retailers Tory Burch, Diane von Furstenberg and Bergdorf Goodman, which allow fans to post not only in the comments, but directly on the Page. Whilst this does create some moderation work, it also underlines the value each company places on its customers.

Last year DKNY briefly turned off the ability for fans to post directly on its Page (a certain PETA protest might have had something to do with that decision). But now, with fans able to post freely on the Page, it is certainly one of the most responsive among fashion brands and retailers. The company’s communications team keeps a close tab on fan comments, furnishing timely responses to questions wherever necessary — a practice rarely carried out by companies of its size.

 

 

 

Flash sales site Gilt practices two-way engagement on its Facebook Page via a sophisticated “Support,” tab where fans can ask questions and deposit feedback. The tab is closely monitored by Gilt’s customer service team, so users can expect to see timely and accurate responses to their queries. (We also love that Gilt gives an early preview of its flash sales, which begin every day at noon, via the “Preview” tab — a great way to drive sales and reward fans.)


4. Build Your Fan Base


 

 

 

While a strong content and engagement strategy can help a Page grow organically, retailers are also bolstering fan numbers by advertising on Facebook and developing multi-channel campaigns.

According to research firm Efficient Frontier, the cost of Facebook ads jumped 40% in 2010, a number that is likely to continue to increase dramatically over the next several years. In her research, Mullen has found that Facebook advertising is the easiest way to build up a fan base, particularly when paid ads are coupled with campaigns that extends across several online and offline channels.

She cites a Covergirl promotion of a new “natural luxe” line of makeup in January. The makeup company ran TV ads prompting viewers not to head to covergirl.com or their nearest Walgreens, but to log in at facebook.com/covergirl, where fans could sign up to be part of the “Covergirl movement,” get free samples and upload videos of themselves sampling makeup. The commercials, which garnered 8,000 Likes on the first day of airing alone, were accompanied by Facebook ads featuring spokesmodels Taylor Swift and Queen Latifah, catapulting Covergirl into the number-two spot (in terms of Facebook Likes) among beauty brands on Facebook.

Oscar de la Renta also employed a cross-channel strategy to build buzz around its first fragrance launch in 10 years. The company leveraged its existing PR assets as well as Facebook ads to drive consumers to sign up for free samples on its Facebook Page. The brand ran through its initial 5,000 sample allotment within 24 hours, and because it was generating so many Likes, the brand decided to give away 25,000 samples, which it ran through in three days, Erika Bearman, Oscar de la Renta’s director of communications, tells us.

Not only was the giveaway successful in terms of press mentions and Facebook Likes — the initiative increased total Page Likes by 40% — it also turned out to be a valuable feedback tool for the company. Approximately 5,000 people took the time to answer questions on the scent in a followup survey, a testament to the two-way nature of Facebook, Bearman notes. “Sampling as a concept is old school, but with a traditional sampling you don’t get to hear what people think,” she says. “I think that the ability to collect feedback on your product is an important advantage to Facebook as a marketing platform,” she adds.


5. Let Your Strategy Evolve


 

 

 

As the case studies above illustrate, a well-developed, engaging content strategy, coupled with on-site advertising and multi-channel campaigns to drive Likes, is the best way to ensure that retailers are prepared for the advent of social media-driven commerce.

It’s also important to keep content fresh, and to evolve one’s Facebook strategy over time. “Be open to evolving your tactics within your strategy to avoid getting too formulaic,” Club Monaco’s Watson reminds retailers.

Jason John, senior direct of marketing at Gilt Groupe, agrees. “Keep experimenting to find the right strategy… [and] alter your communication style on Facebook [whilst] staying true to your brand. You don’t need to be quirky or funny to be successful in social media, just stick with your brand values and create an honest and open conversation with your fans. They will tell you what you need to be successful.”

Full Story

Pound Ridge Luxury Homes

Real estate listings: here, there, everywhere | Inman News in Pound Ridge NY

 

Flickr image courtesy of <a hjref="<a href= 

 There are some things that real estate agents care about, and some things that we don’t care about. I can’t speak for all agents, but people like me who sell real estate for a living don’t always see things the same way that the industry leaders and experts see them.

We don’t always agree with our Realtor boards or the National Association of Realtors.

Most of us don’t care if the data on third-party property websites is accurate. I know I don’t — why should I? I am not the “data police” for someone else’s website.

I am a salesperson, and if I get a call from a prospective buyer about a listing that I sold a month ago I can find another house to sell to that individual. It doesn’t hurt me at all if one of my listings shows up on a website long after it has been sold.

The existence of so many sites with homes for sale on them hurts my business, and manually updating listings takes time away from important tasks like selling houses. If the sites did not exist, consumers would just find my listings on a local brokerage site like my own.

There are many real estate sites in my market that get data fed to them from the area’s multiple listing service. In fact, I just Googled a listing that I have had on the market since Friday and it shows up on thousands of sites.

The way I see it, third parties need my listings for their websites, but I don’t need their websites for advertising, and consumers don’t need them, either.

It is in my best interest to have homes that I have listed for sale appear on numerous websites — even if they are no longer on the market. They are bait for me, just like they are for the companies that use them to sell advertising and services.

But it is against the MLS rules to have a home listed for sale that is not for sale, so I will correct an outdated listing once it is brought to my attention.

Sellers don’t seem to care if we continue to advertise their home after it has been sold, and the buyers don’t seem to notice, either — probably because they are no longer searching on the Internet for a home.

Some property site owners tell me they are doing consumers a favor by giving them alternative sites to search for property listings. I have also been told that consumers don’t trust industry sites and would prefer to go to third-party sources for information.

I don’t think most consumers know who owns their favorite real estate websites — they just want information.

On some days I feel like I am competing with the third-party companies and lead aggregators.

Even though those companies are not brokerages and they don’t sell real estate, they are sucking traffic away from my websites and blogs. Staying ahead in the search engines is a constant battle.

They are using my own listings to attract people to their sites so they can sell those people to real estate agents as leads, or so that they can sell advertising space to agents or others. It is a difficult proposition to help those sites if I find that they are not helping me.

It would be nice if there was more education for consumers about websites. Some of the sites do not have all the listings and some do not have accurate data. Some sites require consumers to sign up, but other sites let them look at the same data without signing up.

Maybe the people who sign up don’t know that they don’t have to share contact information just to look for a home. Consumers should be told that the prettiest site doesn’t always have the best data and that they don’t have to sign up to look at property listings.

If you are depending upon someone like me to make sure that the data on your site is accurate then you are in trouble. I am your worst nightmare because I don’t give much thought about your site or the data on it — not even if my name is attached.

I am motivated to make sure the information I put in the MLS is correct, because if I don’t and I get caught, I will be fined.

I don’t have any control over third-party sites, but if someone had asked me I would have said that we don’t need any more sites with real estate listings on them.

There is a point when listings become ubiquitous, and we reached that point years ago. If having them on many sites meant that they would sell faster, I would be in favor of more sites with property listings on them.

      

 

          

    

Top 25 largest brokerages nationwide | Inman News in Pound Ridge NY


The 500 largest real estate brokerages in the country completed 6.7 percent fewer transaction sides in 2010 than in 2009, according to rankings from real estate publishing and communications company Real Trends.

Real Trends ranks the country’s 500 largest brokerages each year by transaction sides (in every real estate sale there are two transaction “sides”: the buyer’s side and the seller’s side) and closed sales volume.

Transaction sides among the 500 fell to 1.89 million in 2010 from 2.02 million in 2009. Total sales volume rose 1.3 percent, to $513 billion. The average home price among the 500 rose 7.4 percent last year from 2009, to $271,278.

The rise in sales volume was sharper among the top 25 firms: a 4.5 percent increase, to $247.7 billion.

The top five brokerages in both transaction sides and sales volume remained unchanged from last year. For transaction sides, NRT LLC was at the top, followed by HomeServices of America Inc., The Long & Foster Companies Inc., Hanna Holdings Inc., and ZipRealty Inc.

Each closed fewer transaction sides in 2010 than in 2009. NRT closed 259,114 sides, down 5.5 percent from 2009; HomeServices of America closed 114,070 sides, down 7.9 percent; Long & Foster closed 65,284 sides, down 6.6 percent; Hanna Holdings closed 30,493 sides, down 4 percent; and ZipRealty closed 22,013 sides, down 4.7 percent.

Eight of the top 25 brokerages saw their completed transaction sides rise in 2010: Real Estate One (up 2.4 percent); Baird & Warner (4.6 percent); Realty One Group Inc. (35.1 percent); Prudential Douglas Elliman Real Estate (16.3 percent); Re/Max Results (3.5 percent); Keller Williams Realty (0.8 percent); Watson Realty Corp. (2.7 percent); and William Raveis Real Estate Inc. (6.1 percent).

Sales volume rose in 18 out of 25 brokerages in 2010. Among the top five, NRT saw its sales volume increase 5.4 percent to $112.9 billion. Volume at HomeServices of America fell 3.4 percent to $33.8 billion, while at Long & Foster it fell 3.8 percent to $22.9 billion. Prudential Douglas Elliman saw its volume rise 33.5 percent, to $11.5 billion, while at Prudential Fox & Roach Realtors it rose 1.9 percent, to $7 billion.

There were a few newcomers to the top 25 rankings this year. A 35.1 percent increase in closed transaction sides in 2010 pushed Realty One Group Inc. to No. 13 from its No. 26 showing in last year’s list. William Raveis Real Estate Inc. rose from No. 29 to No. 23, with a 6.1 percent rise in closed transaction sides. Despite a 0.2 percent dip in transaction sides, First Team Real Estate rose to No. 24 from No. 28.

A 37.3 percent jump in sales volume in 2010 pushed Houlihan Lawrence up to No. 15 from No. 26. First Weber Group rose to No. 25 from No. 32, with a 24.4 percent rise in sales volume.

Ranked by 2010 closed transaction sidesRanked by 2010 closed sales volume
1.NRT LLCNRT LLC
2.HomeServices of America Inc.HomeServices of America Inc.
3.The Long & Foster Companies Inc.The Long & Foster Companies Inc.
4.Hanna Holdings Inc.Prudential Douglas Elliman Real Estate
5.ZipRealty, Inc.Prudential Fox & Roach Realtors
6.Crye-Leike RealtorsAlain Pinel Realtors Inc.
7.Prudential Fox & Roach RealtorsHanna Holdings Inc.
8.Coldwell Banker United, RealtorsZipRealty Inc.
9.Realty USAFirst Team Real Estate
10.Real Estate OneWilliam Raveis Real Estate Inc.
11.Realty Executives, PhoenixColdwell Banker United, Realtors
12.Baird & WarnerEbby Halliday Real Estate, Inc.
13.Realty One Group Inc.Crye-Leike Realtors
14.Prudential Douglas Elliman Real EstateJohn L. Scott Real Estate
15.Ebby Halliday Real Estate Inc.Houlihan Lawrence
16.Allen Tate CompaniesIntero Real Estate Services
17.West USA Realty Inc.Coldwell Banker Bain & Coldwell Banker Barbara Sue Seal Properties
18.RE/MAX ResultsBaird & Warner
19.Keller Williams RealtyBetter Homes and Gardens Real Estate Mason-McDuffie
20.Watson Realty Corp.Prudential Connecticut Realty
21.John L. Scott Real EstateAllen Tate Companies
22.First Weber GroupRealty Executives, Phoenix
23.William Raveis Real Estate Inc.Realty USA
24.First Team Real EstateWest USA Realty Inc.
25.Hunt Real Estate Corporation/ERAFirst Weber Group

Source: Real Trends

For the first time, Real Trends also ranked the top 25 firms in productivity per sales associate, based on sides and volume. Re/Max brokerages dominated among both lists, taking 21 out of 25 spots in terms of transaction sides per associate, and nine out of the 25 top spots in terms of sales volume per associate.

Also new this year, Real Trends ranked productivity per office. Of the top 25 firms with the most transaction sides per office, Keller Williams brokerages accounted for 10 and Re/Max brokerages accounted for nine. The two franchises also dominated among the top 25 in sales volume per office: Keller Williams accounted for 12 out of 25 while Re/Max accounted for five out of 25.

Contact Inman News:
Email EmailLetter to the Editor Letter to the Editor
Copyright 2011 Inman News

All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.