Daily Archives: June 17, 2013

A Beginners Guide to Content Marketing | Bedford Corners Realtor

Content marketing has changed the way consumers research and buy your products.

content marketing A Beginners Guide to Content MarketingEvery day, people form impressions of brands from many touch points: Ads, product experiences, tweets, Google, Facebook, blog posts, websites, and conversations with family and friends. Unless they are actively shopping for something, a lot of that information passes them by. But when something triggers their buying impulse, those stored impressions become critical — they are top of mind as consumers look to making purchases.

In the traditional sales funnel, consumers begin with a set of potential brands and methodically reduce them to make a purchase decision:

traditional sales funnel A Beginners Guide to Content Marketing

McKinsey points out that today’s consumer decision-making process is circular:

mckinsey consumer decision journey A Beginners Guide to Content Marketing

There are 4 key phases in which marketers can either succeed or fail when a consumer has been triggered to buy something:

  1. Initial consideration (thinking about known brands)
  2. Active evaluation (researching potential purchases)
  3. Closure (the act of buying)
  4. Post-purchase (when consumers experience the products they’ve bought)

The explosion of available products coupled with media fragmentation have led to a reduction in the number of brands that consumers initially consider. Faced with a seemingly limitless number of products and brand information, people tend to depend on brands that have broken through the fire hose of messages.

When your brand is one of those initially considered by a buyer, it is up to 3 times more likely to be purchasedYour goal is to reach consumers at the moments that have the greatest influence on their purchase decisions. This is why content marketing is key.

 

 

A Beginners Guide to Content Marketing | Pamorama | Social Media Marketing Blog.

June NAHB Homebuilder Confidence Rises To 52 | Chappaqua NY Real Estate

The NAHB housing market index for June jumped to 52. This is the highest level since April 2006.

This beat expectations for a rise to 45, from 44 in May.

The eight point increase from May to June is the biggest one month gain since August and September of 2002.

A reading over 50 shows that more builders think sales conditions are good rather than poor.

What’s more? All three sub-indices gained in June.

The index gauging current sales conditions climbed eight points to 56. The index measuring future sales expectations climbed from 52 in May to  61 in June — the highest level since March 2006. Finally, the index of prospective buyers traffic increased seven points to 40.

Investors track this index because it is a leading indicator for housing starts. “Today’s report is consistent with our forecast for a 29 percent increase in total housing starts this year, which would mark the first time since 2007 that starts have topped the 1 million mark,” NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe said in a press release.

In recent months it was reported that affordable mortgage rates were helping buyers. But mortgage rates have been rising and while these haven’t impacted purchase applications, they have weighed on refinance applications. Today’s report shows that homebuilders aren’t fazed by the rise in mortgage rates.

The NAHB housing market index is a sentiment index in which respondents rate not just the housing market but also the economy in general.

The index draws on builder perceptions of current single-family home sales and sales expectations for the next six months. It also includes builders’ expectations of traffic of prospective buyers.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/june-nahb-homebuilder-confidence-2013-6#ixzz2WUdofU2t

 

June NAHB Homebuilder Confidence Rises To 52 – Business Insider.

Is Investing in Housing a Losing Proposition? | Armonk Homes

Last week two Federal Reserve researchers answered that question with an analysis of returns on investment since 1926 and their findings won’t make the housing industry happy.

If a home is purchased only as an investment and not as a place to live, a comparison of average annual returns clearly shows that though most homeowners make a positive return, investing in equities offers favorable returns more often than investing in housing. That’s the bottom line from Ellyn Terry and Jessica Dill, two economists at the Atlanta Federal Reserve, in a working paper published June 12.

The two researchers set out to answer the questions: With average returns so close to zero, just how often has the housing market produced losers? And how does investing in housing compare to investing in equities? They did not look at the “buy and hold” strategies popular among investors seeking cash flow from rents, but only at appreciation.

They computed the average annual return of home prices across all possible combinations of start and stop points using the Shiller house price series from 1926 to 2012. The distribution depicts returns concentrated around zero with some skewness to the right. Eighty percent of all start-stop point observations experience some degree of positive return.

To take into account the duration of ownership, they assumed that the average homeowner lives in his or her home for 13.3 years, based on analysis by Paul Emrath at the National Association of Home Builders. They found the average annual returns for an asset held for a period of 13 or more years is substantially less volatile than for an asset held for fewer than 13 years, and those investing for the longer term were much more likely to have positive returns.

“We compute that 40 percent of homes owned for less than 13 years have negative average annual returns, compared to 12 percent of homes owned for 13 years or more. Interestingly, while a much greater portion of those owning for 13 or more years obtain positive returns, the average annual return was actually slightly higher for those owning fewer than 13 years (0.95 percent versus 1.03 percent),” they found.

They applied weights for average length of ownership. Using the weights, we recomputed average annual returns across all possible combinations of start and stop points for average length of ownership. The distribution continues to show that returns are concentrated around zero with skewness to the right; two-thirds of all investors in this distribution experience some degree of positive return.

Is Investing in Housing a Losing Proposition? | RealEstateEconomyWatch.com.