Tag Archives: Bedford Hills NY Realtor

Bedford Hills NY Realtor

Mortgage rates, bank stocks plunge post election | Bedford Hills Realtor

The Dow Jones industrial average is plunging post-election, falling by as much as 245 points. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index also falling as much as 27, or 1.6%, with bank stocks taking some of the biggest losses.

Bank of America ($9.39 0.16%)JPMorgan Chase ($40.40 0%)Wells Fargo ($32.35 0%) and Goldman Sachs Group ($115.27 0%) are all losing stock value as of midday trading.

Investors are selling off because of the fear of what a fiscal cliff negotiation will mean, said chief investment strategist James Paulsen at Wells Capital Management in a statement.

However, with the economic uncertainty comes changes in mortgage rates because investors are piling up mortgage-backed bonds, driving bond prices up. As a result, mortgage rates are heading down, according to active loan officer Dan Green of Waterstone Mortgage.

For mortgage borrowers in locations such as San Jose, Cali. borrowing at the local conforming loan limit of $625,000, with the mortgage price by 1 discount point, lowers the closing cost by $6,255.

The change is also affecting multiple mortgage products such as HARP 2.0 improvement, FHA Streamline Refinance improvement and BA Streamline Refinance improvement, Green is reporting.

New Home Sales: More Good News for the Housing Market | Bedford Hills Realtor

Sales of new single-family homes rose 5.7 percent in the month September, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 389,000, according to data released today by the Commerce Department that gives continuing indications of a housing market recovery.

The rate of new home sales was 27 percent higher than the seasonally adjusted annual rate of 306,000 for the September 2011 housing market, according to the federal data. The average price of a new home sold in September was $292,400, down slightly from $293,900 for August but up from $255,400 for September of 2011.

September’s rate of new home sales is the highest since the home buyer tax credit expired in early 2012, according to an Eye on Housing blog published today by the National Association of Home Builders, or NAHB, a Washington, DC-based industry association.  The three-month moving average of new home sales has been steadily increasing for more than 12 months, fueling a growing consensus that the U.S. housing market has turned a corner.

The increase in sales is reducing the inventory of available new homes to a seven-year low, according to the NAHB, which reports the existing  supply of new homes will last for 4.5 months if sales continue at the current pace. The number of new homes that are completed and move-in ready remains at a record low of 38,000, according to the NAHB, which describes home builders as “cautious about building ahead of the market.” Tight credit conditions remain a drag on builders’ outlook for the housing market.

Median home prices jumped 11.7 percent from September 2011 to $242,400 in September 2012, according to the NAHB.  The group attributes the price increase primarily to buyers with equity and access to credit moving up to more expensive homes, rather than an overall increase in prices for the housing market.

The latest data also reveals significant regional variations in home prices, according to the NAHB. Over the third quarter, sales rose by 18.5 percent in the Northeast, but fell 8.2 percent in the Midwest.  New home sales rose 4.9 percent in the South and 4 percent in the West.

More housing market news is due Thursday when the National Association of Realtors is scheduled to report pending home sales for the month of September.

Bedford Hills NY Real Estate | A tough week for the Dow, housing stocks

The Dow Jones Industrial average plunged 205 points, or 1.52%, closing at 13,343 on Friday, adding a dose of pessimism to mildly optimistic housing data from the week.

The Dow’s drop, which analysts compared to the 1987 stock plunge, didn’t necessarily kill the momentum homebuilders found earlier in the week when home starts were reported to be on the rise. But bank and builder stocks finished the week with mostly unimpressive results.

Bank of America’s ($9.44 -0.03%) stock barely moved the needle when comparing Friday’s close to the company’s price at opening. Wells Fargo’s ($34.34 -0.23%) stock edged down slightly, along with JPMorgan Chase ($42.32 -0.69%).

Citigroup ($37.16 -1.26%) took the biggest hit with its stock down 3% at market close before rising somewhat in after-hours trading. The banking giant made headlines earlier in the week when its CEO Vikram Pandit stepped down.

Homebuilders, on the other hand, are still feeling some momentum from rising home starts, which suggested a mildly positive turn on the home construction side of the housing market.

KB Home ($34.64 -0.9%) finished the week up 1.02%, while Pulte Group Inc. ($17.89 0.24%) and luxury builder Toll Brothers ($35.10 0.4%) rose just over 1%. D.R. Horton’s ($21.48 -0.07%) edged down slightly, while Lennar ($38.73 0.05%) inched up.

Still, the housing sector is facing some uncertainty.

September existing-home sales fell slightly from the previous month in September, but remain well above year-ago levels, according to the National Association of Realtors.

via housingwire.com

A Federal Fix for a Foreclosure Fiasco | Bedford Hills Realtor

The U.S. construction industry boomed through most of the 1920s as new office buildings, factories, warehouses and homes were built across the country.

A developing securities market, in which commercial bonds could be sold to finance construction, helped boost the housing surge. In 1928, however, the Federal Reserve tightened monetary policy to stem speculation, especially in the stock market, and housing investment began to fall.

When the global economic crisis triggered widespread unemployment and bankruptcies, property owners’ abilities to make mortgage payments crumbled. This was particularly unsettling because many home mortgages were five-year agreements with a balloon payment due at the end. Banks had repeatedly renewed these contracts, adjusting interest rates to prevailing levels.

As home values rose, families had made frequent use of second mortgages with high interest rates to make improvements or to realize cash for other purposes. By 1932, renewals had vanished and second mortgages went unpaid.

This mortgage-finance system rapidly fell apart. Foreclosures multiplied, to 1,000 a day by late 1932. Assets underlying mortgage loans were deflating even as householders’ payments became unreliable. What was the government to do?

President Herbert Hoover, though reluctant to support big government programs, recognized the scale of this looming disaster. He proposed that Congress create a system of Federal Home Loan Banks, with 12 districts and a membership drawn from mortgage-holding institutions, including insurance companies, cooperative banks and homestead associations.

The core idea was that “bonds, guaranteed by mortgages accepted by the home loan system, will be offered to the public to increase the circulation of money,” the New York Times reported.

The 12 banks would loan as much as $125 million, initially supplied by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, to distressed building-and-loan firms, taking in good mortgages as collateral. They then would securitize these holdings, thus restoring their cash accounts to fund further lending, increasing the country’s cash flow.

Opposition from the banking industry was immediate. The primary objective was that the loan-bank system “further intrudes the government into private business,” the New York Times reported. “There is no lack of funds at present for the use of home mortgage institutions. The bill would encourage unhealthy home building.” Even worse, the home-loan banks’ bonds couldn’t be sold.

Despite objections, House and Senate committees pushed the bill forward, and on July 22, 1932, Hoover signed the legislation. The new institution’s chairman, Franklin Fort, soon called for a mortgage holiday to stop foreclosures until the system could get up and running. Forty states confirmed their assent.

The Federal Home Loan Banks opened their ledgers on Oct. 15, though it was far from clear, as New York Representative Fiorello LaGuardia put it, whether “the influence of selfish institutions would predominate” over the needs of hard-pressed homeowners.

Hoover had tried his best, and Election Day was just three weeks ahead.

(Philip Scranton is a Board of Governors professor of the history of industry and technology at Rutgers University, Camden, and the editor-in-chief of Enterprise and Society. He writes “This Week in the Great Depression” for the Echoes blog. The opinions expressed are his own.)

Read more from Echoes, Bloomberg View’s economic history blog.

To contact the writer of this blog post: Philip Scranton at scranton@camden.rutgers.edu.

To contact the editor responsible for this blog post: Kirsten Salyer at ksalyer@bloomberg.net.