Category Archives: Cross River NY
To pull or not to pull? | Katonah Real Estate
ReadWrite – Why YouTubers Hate The Site’s New Layout | Cross River Real Estate
Short Sales Overtook REO Sales in Q3 | Chappaqua Real Estate
For the first time ever, sales of properties in some stage of foreclosure (pre-foreclosure sales) outnumbered sales of bank-owned properties (REO) in the third quarter, as short sales continue to gain market share at the expense of REO and sales of completed foreclosures at auction.
Pre-foreclosure sales, largely short sales, increased 22 percent from the second quarter and were also up 22 percent from the third quarter of 2011, while the average sales price decreased 3 percent from the previous quarter and was down 5 percent from a year ago, according to RealtyTrac. A total of 98,125 pre-foreclosure sales occurred during the quarter compared to a total of 94,934 REO sales.
By contrast, REO sales increased 19 percent from the previous quarter but were still down 20 percent from the third quarter of 2011. A total of 193,059 U.S. properties in some stage of foreclosure or bank-owned (REO) were sold during the third quarter, an increase of 21 percent from the previous quarter, but still down 3 percent from the third quarter of 2011. Foreclosure-related sales accounted for 19 percent of all U.S. residential sales during the third quarter – down from 20 percent in the previous quarter but the same level as in the third quarter of 2011.
Pre-foreclosure properties sold for an average price of $191,025 in the third quarter, down 3 percent from the second quarter and down 5 percent from the third quarter of 2011. The average sales price of a pre-foreclosure residential property in the third quarter was 27 percent below the average sales price of a non-foreclosure residential property, up from a 25 percent discount in the previous quarter and a 19 percent discount in the third quarter of 2011.
The average REO sales price decreased 7 percent from the previous quarter but was still up 7 percent from the third quarter of 2011. REOs sold for an average price of $161,954 in the third quarter, down 7 percent from the second quarter but up 7 percent from the third quarter of 2011. The average sales price of a bank-owned home in the third quarter was 38 percent below the average price of a non-foreclosure home, up from a 33 percent discount in the second quarter but down from a 39 percent discount in the third quarter of 2011.
Homes in foreclosure or bank owned sold at an average price that was 32 percent below the average price of a home not in foreclosure, up from a 29 percent discount in the second quarter and a 31 percent discount in the third quarter of 2011.
Short sales of properties not in the foreclosure process increased 15 percent from the previous quarter and were up 17 percent from the third quarter of 2011. These non-foreclosure short sales accounted for an estimated 22 percent of all residential sales, bringing the total distressed sale share to an estimated 41 percent for the quarter. Non-foreclosure short sales prices in the third quarter fell short of the total amount of loans outstanding by an average of $82,312 per short sale. For all short sales, including non-foreclosure and in-foreclosure properties, the sales price was short of combined loan amounts by average of $94,896 per short sale.
“The shift toward earlier disposition of distressed properties continued in the third quarter as both lenders and at-risk homeowners are realizing that short sales are often a better alternative than foreclosure,” said Daren Blomquist, vice president of RealtyTrac. “However, the scheduled expiration of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act at the end of this year could stifle this trend toward short sales. If that law expires as scheduled, homeowners who agree to a short sale could see their income tax jump significantly because the portion of the unpaid loan balance not covered by the short sale proceeds will be considered taxable income in many cases.
Pre-foreclosure homes that sold in the third quarter took an average of 359 days to sell after starting the foreclosure process, up from an average of 319 days in the previous quarter and up from an average of 318 days in the third quarter of 2011.
Third parties purchased a total of 94,934 bank-owned (REO) residential properties in the third quarter, an increase of 19 percent from the previous quarter but down 20 percent from the third quarter of 2011. REO sales accounted for 10 percent of all residential sales during the quarter, the same as in the second quarter but down from 11 percent of sales in the third quarter of 2011.
Separately, Lender Processing Services reported yesterday that foreclosure starts declined significantly foreclosure starts over the last two months – down 21.9 percent in October and almost 48 percent on a year-over-year basis – leading to a nearly 7 percent drop in overall foreclosure inventory.
“LPS observed a drop-off in foreclosure starts in September that accelerated in October,” Blecher said. “This decline coincided with the implementation of new procedural changes outlined in the National Mortgage Settlement, which requires, among other things, that mortgage servicers provide written notice to borrowers 14 days prior to referring a delinquent loan to a foreclosure attorney. This has resulted in what is likely a temporary slowdown in foreclosure starts that we do not believe is indicative of a longer-term trend. However, we will continue to monitor this activity closely in the coming months.”
The LPS Mortgage Monitor reported that September loan originations were down, likely due to the shortened number of business days in the month. However, prepayment speeds (historically a good indicator of refinance activity) rebounded in October, and as such, LPS expects to see overall origination numbers pick up for that month. LPS also found that mortgage spreads remain elevated, averaging 197 basis points above the 10-Year Treasury rates, with interest rates consistent across all product types.
Jobless Claims | Katonah Real Estate
Mortgage rates move slightly up | Cross River NY Real Estate
Asking prices stay strong into autumn | Chappaqua NY Real Estate
Asking prices for homes on real estate portal Trulia’s website were up 3.8 percent in November from a year ago, the largest year-over-year increase since the housing recession began, according to a monthly report from Trulia.
In addition to posting annual gains, asking prices showed strength going into the seasonal autumn slowdown in sales, with list prices for the three months ending in November up a non-seasonally adjusted 0.8 percent from the previous quarter, Trulia said.
The report, which covers for-sale and for-rent properties listed on Trulia through Nov. 30, showed that asking prices on for-sale homes posted annual gains in 76 of the 100 largest U.S. metro areas. When foreclosures were excluded from the equation, list prices were up 4.3 percent for the year.
November 2012 Trulia list price summary
Time period Change in list prices Change in list prices, excluding foreclosures No. of 100 largest metros with list-price increases month-over-month, seasonally adjusted 0.8% 0.8% Not reported quarter-over-quarter, seasonally adjusted 2.2% 1.6% 70 year-over-year 3.8% 4.3% 76 Source: Trulia
Price gains, though significant overall, are more pronounced in some metros than others, the report noted. Many large metros fared better than smaller ones.
“Prices are rising faster than at any point since the bubble burst, but the price recovery is becoming more uneven,” said Jed Kolko, Trulia’s chief economist, in a statement. “Price gains are starting to waver in smaller markets.”
Jed KolkoAtlanta, Riverside-San Bernardino, Calif., and Sacramento, Calif., are three metros hard hit by the housing collapse that saw significant quarter-over-quarter growth in November to match the sustained growth seen by Phoenix, Las Vegas and Miami over the course of the year.
Asking rents were up, too, in November, jumping 5.6 percent from a year ago. But asking-price gains, the report showed, are now greater than rent-price gains in the 25 largest rental markets, including Denver, Seattle and San Francisco.
Metros* with largest increases in asking rent, November 2012
Rank Metro Change in asking rents from a year ago 1 Houston 16.8% 2 Oakland, Calif. 11.6% 3 Miami 10.8% 4 Denver 9.0% 5 Philadelphia 8.9% 6 Seattle 8.3% 7 Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn.-Wis. 7.8% 8 Chicago 6.9% 9 New York, N.Y.-N.J. 6.6% 10 San Francisco 5.8% *Among the 25 largest rental markets.
Negligent life tenant raises foreclosure risk | Cross River Real Estate
DEAR BENNY: My sisters and I “own” some Tennessee properties inherited from my late father, who died in 1984. In his will, he wanted to provide for his current wife (“B”), so she was given a “life estate” for her use of both properties during her lifetime. My sisters and I are the owners on the deeds. One of the properties is a residence, and the other is an income-producing commercial property.
Fast forward to today, and here’s the picture: The residential property has been abandoned for three years now, housing mold and the occasional vagrant. “B” has advanced Alzheimer’s, and is in a nursing facility; she seems destined to live forever in that regrettable state. Her guardian (daughter) states that “B” will not return to the residence, and they have stopped insuring it or paying real estate taxes on it.
We have received nothing from the county tax office, so I inquired and found the taxes are unpaid for the previous two years, as well as for this current year. After three years of nonpayment, the county can auction the property for back taxes. I asked them to send me the tax bills. My sisters and I are confused at how “B” and her guardian can renounce their financial responsibilities and yet retain control of the deteriorating property.
The commercial property is producing income for “B” and family, and the taxes are currently paid. We have offered to let “B” enjoy continuing beneficial control of the commercial property if she will abandon claims on the residence, so that we can save the house from complete destruction, but they say their attorney advises that they can’t do that, and they don’t really care anyway.
What are we to do? Is there a legal action to remedy this situation? –John
DEAR JOHN: I don’t know Tennessee law, but your question sounds like what we lawyers call a “waste issue” with respect to the residential property. The life tenant can be sued for waste, meaning that by her inaction, she is letting the property deteriorate (i.e., going to waste).
Usually it is a damage claim, but there are cases where, faced with facts showing that the life tenant is not properly maintaining the property, the court may order injunctive relief in the form of allowing the remainderpersons to receive the property. You all are the remainderpersons.
Either way, it would require paying off the life tenant for the remaining value of the life tenancy, which uses actuarial tables based on age of life tenant, value of property and applicable federal rate. Waste damages could be deducted from any payoff to the life tenant, as would taxes and other maintenance costs the life tenant is required to pay.
Life tenants are entitled to rental income on property. The life tenant must pay taxes, insurance and upkeep of the property, and is entitled to income unless specifically stated otherwise in a last will and testament or the instrument creating the life estate.
DEAR BENNY: What are the tax complications of gifting a home? In one of your columns you wrote: “If you die and leave the house to someone, that person gets the stepped-up basis. In other words, the value of the property at the time of death. …” My question is, wouldn’t the brother who received the gift have to pay an inheritance tax if the property was not in a trust? –Don
DEAR DON: Inheritance laws vary state by state. For example, Virginia and the District of Columbia have no inheritance tax. States that do have inheritance tax have exemptions for property passing to certain family members. A brother may or may not be exempt depending on state law.
You may also be thinking of estate tax, which is a transfer tax on the value of assets transferred on account of the decedent’s death, reaching probate and nonprobate assets. The federal exemption is currently $5.12 million. Under certain state laws, such as in Maryland and the District of Columbia, there is an estate tax imposed for assets that pass from a decedent. Both Maryland and the District of Columbia impose estate tax on assets of greater than $1 million. The tax is imposed on the estate rather than the recipient, unless there are insufficient assets in the estate to pay the tax.
I don’t know all of the state laws, so you really should consult an attorney in your state. Alternatively, many states have lots of information on their website, so check there first.
DEAR BENNY: We live in a large condominium complex and our unit happens to be located close enough to the lobby that we hear the elevator constantly. The sound, what I call harmonizing, has been occurring for the last five to six years. I have spoken to the management many times and they have responded by repairing, but the fix is never long-lasting.
This noise is mind-numbing since it is more of a scraping sound that on occasion seems to go right through you.
My question is, would it be too much if I told management that I will no longer pay assessments until this issue has been resolved? Would I be justified in doing this? I have looked in the bylaws and found nothing pertaining to an issue like this. What would you suggest? –Mark
DEAR MARK: No! No! No! I cannot under any circumstances recommend that any homeowner in a community association, whether that be a condominium, a cooperative or in a homeowners association, withhold the assessment.
There are several reasons. First, you admit that this problem has been plaguing you for several years. If you suddenly decide to withhold your association assessments, I seriously doubt that a judge would be sympathetic.
More importantly, as soon as you are delinquent, I suspect your association will start collection efforts, which can include filing a lawsuit against you. Once again, while you may have a legitimate concern, case law throughout this country makes it clear that a homeowner has an obligation to pay his assessment, regardless of any problems that the homeowner has.
You will be accused of just trying to get out of paying the assessment, and using the noise problem as an excuse.
I don’t mean to be unsympathetic; I just don’t think it’s a good idea to withhold your assessment. However, that does not mean you don’t have remedies. You claim that the noise is a major concern. Noise is subjective; I have often joked that my definition of noise is my son’s definition of music.
You need to prove that the noise is excessive. I suggest you ask the association board to hire an acoustical engineer to do a study of the noise level in your unit. If the board refuses, then you should hire the engineer yourself. Once you get a report that indicates that the noise in your apartment is above acceptable levels, present that report formally to the board and demand that they resolve the situation. A good engineer will also recommend possible solutions to the problem.
In the final analysis, you may have to file suit. At that point in time, you can start withholding your assessment, but make sure that you give it to someone (perhaps your attorney) to hold in escrow. You don’t want the judge to think you are a deadbeat, just trying to avoid paying the assessment.
This way, you are the plaintiff and not the defendant. In my opinion, it makes you look more favorable to a judge.
DEAR BENNY: We have Diamond points and want to know how to not burden our four adult kids with them. They cannot afford them. Actually, I do not want to burden my wife with them and wonder where I can get advice. –Phil
DEAR PHIL: I was not familiar with Diamond points, so I researched this on the Internet. Frankly, I was shocked at the number of websites offering to sell (or rent) those points. For my readers, Diamond Resorts International operates as a form of time share, and for those who have been following my column, you will know that I get more time-share questions than on any other subject.
I don’t know the answer and seek guidance from readers who may have had success in selling their points. However, I do want to repeat my strong advice: If you find someone who is prepared to sell your time share (or your points or any other similar product), under no circumstances should you give them any money upfront.
You should also contact the Better Business Bureau in your area to determine if it has had complaints about that company.
Also, contact your state’s attorney general, since there have been many lawsuits against fraudulent time-share sellers filed by a number of attorneys general (as well as a number of class actions filed by private attorneys.










