NY Cuomo asks U.S. to pay 49 pct of cost of Tappan Zee span
StocksInvesco Municipal Premium Income TrustPIA$9.440.01
Sept 7 | Sat Sep 8, 2012 5:54am IST
(Reuters) – Some 49 percent of New York’s new Tappan Zee bridge should be paid for with a federal loan of as much as $2.9 billion, according to an application by the state Thruway Authority.
The new Hudson River crossing, needed to replace the current dilapidated bridge, would also be funded with $2.3 billion to $2.7 billion of bonds that would be repaid with tolls.
Several New York governors have studied replacing the 1955 bridge, an important span for the New York City area that links Westchester County on the east to Rockland County on the west.
Governor Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, has made the most progress so far but the federal loan he seeks is a large share of the $17 billion total available for all states under the Transportation Infrastructure and Innovation Act.
And a proposal to almost triple cash tolls to $14 encountered such stiff resistance that Cuomo directed Thruway officials to find ways to lower that increase.
The cost of the bridge is now estimated at $4.7 billion to $5.4 billion, according to the state’s application. When one of three developers is selected in October, that estimate will be finalized.
Cuomo’s new request for a federal loan – $900 million bigger than the one he sought last year and did not get – would shrink to almost $2.5 billion under the smaller cost estimate.
A spokesman for the Thruway Authority had no immediate comment. In June, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services revised the Thruway’s outlook to negative from stable, citing financial concerns about paying for the new bridge. The credit agency rates the Thruway Authority A-plus.
The existing Tappan Zee Bridge has aged poorly and it carries 138,000 vehicles a day, nearly 40 percent more than it was originally designed to carry.
Renovating it would cost $3 billion to $4 billion and only extend its life by 25 years, state officials say, arguing a new bridge would be more economic because it would last 100 years.
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- ReprintsWe welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/Comments (0)Be the first to comment on reuters.com.Add yours using the box above.
Ads by Google