The Truth about Lending Standards | Bedford Hills Real Estate

Perhaps you have heard that it’s getting easier to get approved for a mortgage to buy a home. Yet the first-time buyers you work with don’t seem to be doing any better than they did six, 12 or even 24 months ago.

The news reports you’ve been reading are misleading.  They may accurately trends for refi mortgages or mortgages as a whole but not for purchase loans—mortgages to buy houses–which is the focus of most of the public concern about standards.

What’s going on?

Six months ago I published an article titled “Why Lending Standards Won’t Get Better”. ‘’Today’s lending standards were written to protect lenders and federal budgeters, not to help renters become homeowners.  Despite pressure from the public, lending standards probably won’t change much more in the foreseeable future than they already have,’ I wrote at the time.

I’m sorry to say, it looks like I was right.  We are deep into the best market for home sales in nearly a decade and the latest hard data shows that it is just as difficult to qualify for a purchase mortgage in July as it was last March–or even in March 2012.

Reports of that looser standards are making it easier to get a mortgage are of two types:

Some are simply surveys of lenders or experts, like the Federal Reserve’s quarterly Survey of Senior Loan Officers or Pulsenomic’s survey of real estate economists and experts.  Both made headlines in recent months by announcing access to credit has eased, or is easing.  Both are based on perceptions, expectations and attitudes, not on hard data.

Others, like the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Mortgage Credit Availability Index, combine purchase loans with refis to provide a picture of credit accessibility that’s virtually useless for a discussion of home purchases and the barriers facing first-time buyers.  The fact is that standards for refis are indeed significantly lower while standards for purchase loans have been virtually frozen for years. For example, median FICOs for conventional closed refis in July were 727, for conventional closed purchase loans 757—a 30 point difference.  Combining data on the two different uses hides what is really going on to purchases loans.

Standards for refis have loosened much more for refis than for purchase loans. A good way to measure the difference between standards used to make lending decisions is to review and compare the real-life results of those decisions.  Below is an update of a table I included in my May article expanded to include July 2015 and refi data, for comparison purposes. It includes data on closed loans for the two most popular categories of mortgages for home buyers, FHA and conventional loans.  The data come from Ellie Mae, the industry-leading mortgage processing platform which processed approximately 3.7 million loan applications in 2014.



How Lending Standards Differ for Conventional and FHA Refi and Purchase Loans

March 2012-July 2015

  Loan Type/Standard  March 2012  March 2015  July 2015  Percentage improvement, March 2012-July 2015
Conventional Purchase Loans
FICO 764 755 757 1%
LTV 79 81 80 1%
Back end DTI* 33 34 34 2.9%
Conventional Refi Loans
FICO 771 742 727 6%
LTV 65 70 70 8%
Back end DTI* 32 37 40 25%
FHA Purchase Loans
FICO 701 685 689 1.7%
LTV 96 95 96 0
Back end DTI* 41 41 41 0
FHA Refi Loans
FICO 724 685 660 8.8%
LTV 88 85 82 6,8%
Back end DTI* 39 41 41 5.1%

Average FICO scores, loan-to-value ratios, and debt-to-income ratios from Ellie Mae Origination Insight Reports

Over the past 16 months, the three critical metrics used to show the impact of lending standards—FICO scores, loan-to-value ratios and debt-to-income ratios have barely while refis have indeed become measurably more accessible to borrowers.


read more…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *