Daily Archives: January 18, 2013

Advanced Photo Editing Tool For Realtors | Katonah Real Estate

Advanced Photo Editing Tool For Realtors

by Steve Pacinelli on Jan 3rd, 2013
in Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Photo/Video, Product Reviews, Text

In some of our previous posts about taking better photos and our photo editing series we went over some of the basics for enhancing our images.  Now, I want to introduce you to a more advanced program called Nik Color Efex Pro 4.

This is a program that I use religiously to edit and refine almost all of my images.  In the video below I am going to cover one of it’s 50+ photo editing filters and how to quickly and easily get fantastic results for your real estate pics.  The graduated filter is phenomenal for adding any color sky you want to your images.  One caveat, you need to have Photoshop, Lightroom or Aperture before you can add this tool on to your workflow.  If you do use any of these systems, Nik has a 30 day free trial that you can use without having to put in a credit card.

Nik Color Efex 4 is form the same company that makes Snapseed for your mobile device!

Armonk NY Area Low Sales Price for 2012 | Armonk NY Homes

Armonk NY Area Low Sales Price for 2012  |  Armonk NY Homes

2012 Low Sales Price
Katonah$365,000.00
Mt Kisco$262,500.00
Bedford Hills$263,000.00
Bedford Village$418,500.00
North Salem$125,000.00
South Salem$185,000.00
Pound Ridge$355,000.00
Chappaqua$225,000.00
Armonk$150,000.00

The Difference between Strategy and Tactics | South Salem Realtor

Apple World

The purpose of this post is to clearly delineate the distinct differences between strategy and tactics, and show how they work in tandem for your organization.

Often, we use the terms strategy and tactics interchangeably and in a haphazard manner.  When probing at online definitions and dictionaries, they often share many of the same characteristics, making them difficult to differentiate.  Rather than debate Greek military etymology, Sun Tzu philosophy, or latest publication from the Harvard Business Press, here’s strategy and tactics delineated by their associated actions:

[The difference between strategy and tactics: strategy is done above the shoulders, tactics are done below the shoulders]

While a tweet-worthy catch phrase, this metaphor risks glib over-simplification. To explore deeper, let’s dissect strategy vs tactics in the following breakdown:

Breakdown: The Difference between Strategy and Tactics

StrategyTactics
PurposeTo identify clear broader goals that advance the overall organization and organize resources.To utilize specific resources to achieve sub-goals that support the defined mission.
RolesIndividuals who influence resources in the organization. They understand how a set of tactics work together to achieve goals.Specific domain experts that maneuver limited resources into actions to achieve a set of goals.
AccountabilityHeld accountable to overall health of organization.Held accountable to specific resources assigned.
ScopeAll the resources within the organizations, as well as broader market conditions including competitors, customers, and economy.  Yet don’t over think it, to paraphrase my business partner Charlene Li, “Strategy is often what you don’t do”.A subset of resources used in a plan or process. Tactics are often specific tactics with limited resources to achieve broader goals.
DurationLong Term, changes infrequently.Shorter Term, flexible to specific market conditions.
MethodsUses experience, research, analysis, thinking, then communication.Uses experiences, best practices, plans, processes, and teams.
OutputsProduces clear organizational goals, plans, maps, guideposts, and key performance measurements.Produces clear deliverables and outputs using people, tools, time.

Strategy and Tactics Must Work in Tandem
These two must work in tandem, without it your organization cannot efficiently achieve goals.  If you have strategy without tactics you have big thinkers and no action. If you have tactics without strategy, you have disorder.  To quote my former business partner, Lora Cecere, she reminds me that organizations need big wings (strategic thinking) and feet (capability to achieve).

Examples:
To illustrate, here’s some specific examples across different industries of how strategic goals can be communicated with clear tactical elements, in a linear and logical order:

  • Strategy: Be the market share leader in terms of sales in the mid-market in our industry. Tactics: Offer lower cost solutions than enterprise competitors without sacrificing white-glove service for first 3 years of customer contracts.
  • Strategy: Maneuver our brand into top two consideration set of household decision makers. Tactics: Deploy a marketing campaign that leverages existing customer reviews and spurs them to conduct word of mouth with their peers in online and real world events.
  • Strategy: Improve retention of top 10% of company performers. Tactics: Offer best in market compensation plan with benefits as well as sabbaticals to tenured top performers, source ideas from top talent.
  • Strategy: Connect with customers while in our store and increase sales. Tactics: Offer location based mobile apps on top three platforms, and provide top 5 needed use cases based on customer desire and usage patterns.
  • Strategy: Become a social utility that earth uses on an daily basis. Tactics: Offer a free global communication toolset that enables disparate personal interactions with your friends to monitor, share, and interact with.

Action: Using Strategy and Tactics to advance your Organization
First, educate your staff and colleagues on the differences of terms and how they vary.  Next, ensure that all tactics align to business strategy, and all strategies take into account tactics on how they will be achieved.  Finally, cascade in all communication how strategy and tactics work in tandem, advancing how your organization can see the larger goals, and better utilize resources to achieve.

That’s my take, but please expand the conversation with your perspective, in the comments below.

Image credit: “Telescope” by Kristin Marshall, used within creative commons licensing.

New Jersey plays catch-up in foreclosure market | South Salem NY Real Estate

foreclosure-nj Joe Raedle Getty Images.JPG Foreclosures are down nationwide, but linger in New Jersey. Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Despite a drop in foreclosures nationwide, New Jersey continues to play catch-up.

A report today from RealtyTrac showed foreclosure activity dropped signnificantly as banks have been encouraged to work with homeowners to find ways to kep them in their homes or unload them through short sales, in which the property is sold for less than the debt owed on it.

Bank repossessions were down 17 percent nationally last year, according to RealtyTrac. Foreclosure filings dropped 3 percent. That represents a drop of 36 percent from a peak in 2010, the firm said.

But foreclosures surged in New Jersey by 55 percent over last year. New Jersey, along with Florida and Illinois, saw the largest increases in foreclosure activity.

So-called judicial states like New Jersey, in which the process must go through the courts, take longer to resolve cases. A backlog built up in 2011 when courts ordered the the mortgage industry to address charges the companies employed questionable procedures in order to streamline the process, often hurting homeowners.

In New Jersey, the foreclosure process can take up to three years to complete, leaving a larger than average backlog.

While foreclosure activity declined last year, the inventory of homes in some stage of foreclosure or in banks’ possession climbed 9 percent to 1.5 million homes, RealtyTrac said.

Florida accounted for the biggest share of foreclosure inventory last year, or 20 percent of the national total.
The Associated Press contributed to this report

via nj.com